Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 29 of 29

Thread: Graduated ND Filters

  1. #21
    joebranko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,420
    Real Name
    Joe

    Re: Graduated ND Filters

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Humphries View Post
    Hi Joe,

    One type not mentioned is a Reverse ND Grad. for sunsets/rises, since this preserves the less bright sky above you - I'm sure we had someone here that found them useful.
    The reverse grad certainly looks interesting. I will have to give this further thought. Thanks Dave.

    WRT using the graduated filter in Lightroom: I have done this also, but worry, with every additional digital adjustment in PP, am I adding noise to the final product?

  2. #22
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,169
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Graduated ND Filters

    Quote Originally Posted by joebranko View Post
    The reverse grad certainly looks interesting.
    Joe - I've read about these, but have never actually met anyone who uses one.

    Quote Originally Posted by joebranko View Post
    WRT using the graduated filter in Lightroom: I have done this also, but worry, with every additional digital adjustment in PP, am I adding noise to the final product?
    No. Noise comes from your camera only. The output from any PP software is not going to add noise. Noise will tend to be in the shadow areas, rather in the highlight areas.

    You can certainly emulate what a GND does in post, but only if you have not blown out details in the sky. This is the primary reason I use them, to ensure that I get a clean, usable sky.

  3. #23
    joebranko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,420
    Real Name
    Joe

    Re: Graduated ND Filters

    Quote Originally Posted by GrumpyDiver View Post
    You can certainly emulate what a GND does in post, but only if you have not blown out details in the sky.
    I know I have blown details in the sky when taking sunsets! And trying to recover them in PP was useless. Thanks again.

  4. #24
    joebranko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,420
    Real Name
    Joe

    Re: Graduated ND Filters

    Thanks everyone for your input on this issue. I will be looking for a soft transition 3 stop GND with 72 and 77mm adapters. I will also research the reverse GND further.

  5. #25
    dje's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Brisbane Australia
    Posts
    4,636
    Real Name
    Dave Ellis

    Re: Graduated ND Filters

    Hi Joe

    I have a 3 stop reverse grad but have rarely used it. I just haven't found the need for it compared to ordinary GND's. I believe that Reverse grads are meant to cover the situation where the sun is just above the horizon. In this situation, you can have very bright direct sunlight in shot (unless it is filtered by cloud) but 3 stops of filtering with a reverse grad will not stop it blowing out anyway.

    I don't usually shoot sunrises or sunsets when the sun is above the horizon unless there are clouds just above the horizon. I thnk this shot may have been done with my reverse grad.

    Dave


    Graduated ND Filters
    Last edited by dje; 8th February 2016 at 05:12 AM. Reason: Original image substituted with intended image

  6. #26
    Moderator Dave Humphries's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Windsor, Berks, UK
    Posts
    16,748
    Real Name
    Dave Humphries :)

    Re: Graduated ND Filters

    Hi Joe,

    Quote Originally Posted by joebranko View Post
    I know I have blown details in the sky when taking sunsets!
    Is reducing the exposure an option? (with apologies for stating the obvious)
    Is the cause of the blown details due to metering issues?
    Or using insufficient Exposure Compensation?

    Although ...
    If you (also) want a shot with your current exposure to preserve 'foreground in shadow' detail, you could 'bracket' (with a wide exposure range) and combine the shots in PP on different layers via masking. Yeah, it probably is more work than using a GND with practice.

    HTH, Dave

  7. #27
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,169
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Graduated ND Filters

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Humphries View Post
    If you (also) want a shot with your current exposure to preserve 'foreground in shadow' detail, you could 'bracket' (with a wide exposure range) and combine the shots in PP on different layers via masking. Yeah, it probably is more work than using a GND with practice.
    Yes, that would work, but shooting with a GND is a lot less work.

  8. #28
    joebranko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,420
    Real Name
    Joe

    Re: Graduated ND Filters

    Quote Originally Posted by dje View Post
    Hi Joe

    I have a 3 stop reverse grad but have rarely used it. I just haven't found the need for it compared to ordinary GND's. I believe that Reverse grads are meant to cover the situation where the sun is just above the horizon. In this situation, you can have very bright direct sunlight in shot (unless it is filtered by cloud) but 3 stops of filtering with a reverse grad will not stop it blowing out anyway.

    I don't usually shoot sunrises or sunsets when the sun is above the horizon unless there are clouds just above the horizon. I thnk this shot may have been done with my reverse grad.

    Dave

    Graduated ND Filters
    And it is a beautiful shot. It could be used as a commercial for reverse GND! Thanks for this input!

  9. #29
    joebranko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    2,420
    Real Name
    Joe

    Re: Graduated ND Filters

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Humphries View Post
    Hi Joe,



    Is reducing the exposure an option? (with apologies for stating the obvious)
    Is the cause of the blown details due to metering issues?
    Or using insufficient Exposure Compensation?
    I really can't say what, if any , exposure compensation I may have used in the sunset shots in which I blew away the details. But thanks for that suggestion Dave.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •