Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Back in Black

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Virginia - USA
    Posts
    884
    Real Name
    Sam

    Back in Black

    Just practicing conversions:

    Back in Black

    Back in Black

  2. #2
    Digital's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Carrollton, Georgia (USA)
    Posts
    2,757
    Real Name
    Bruce

    Re: Back in Black

    Sam, I like the color version better in my humble opinion. Was you subject facing into the sun when this was taken? She seems to be squinting. Based on the shadow behind her, I answered my own question.

    Bruce

  3. #3
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,716
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Back in Black

    Pretty good conversion.

  4. #4
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,402
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: Back in Black

    I agree with Bruce...

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,166
    Real Name
    Griddi

    Re: Back in Black

    I also agree with Bruce, although I like B / W, but it depends often on the image.......

    Griddi.......

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    North West of England
    Posts
    7,178
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Back in Black

    As a portrait, I also prefer the colour but that I guess, wasn't the point of the post. The conversion is a good one , given the contrasty lighting conditions. Full range of tones with detail in the black and the highlights plus the skin tones are just about right as well. Success (IMHO).

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Virginia - USA
    Posts
    884
    Real Name
    Sam

    Re: Back in Black

    Quote Originally Posted by John 2 View Post
    As a portrait, I also prefer the colour but that I guess, wasn't the point of the post. The conversion is a good one , given the contrasty lighting conditions. Full range of tones with detail in the black and the highlights plus the skin tones are just about right as well. Success (IMHO).
    Thanks John, you got it... an exercise/practice in conversion.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Virginia - USA
    Posts
    884
    Real Name
    Sam

    Re: Back in Black

    Quote Originally Posted by Digital View Post
    Sam, I like the color version better in my humble opinion. Was you subject facing into the sun when this was taken? She seems to be squinting. Based on the shadow behind her, I answered my own question.

    Bruce
    Thanks Bruce. Any thoughts on the conversion?

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Virginia - USA
    Posts
    884
    Real Name
    Sam

    Re: Back in Black

    Quote Originally Posted by rpcrowe View Post
    I agree with Bruce...
    Thanks Richard, any thoughts on the conversion?

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Virginia - USA
    Posts
    884
    Real Name
    Sam

    Re: Back in Black

    Quote Originally Posted by just me View Post
    I also agree with Bruce, although I like B / W, but it depends often on the image.......

    Griddi.......
    Thanks Griddi

  11. #11
    Digital's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Carrollton, Georgia (USA)
    Posts
    2,757
    Real Name
    Bruce

    Re: Back in Black

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam W View Post
    Thanks Bruce. Any thoughts on the conversion?
    Sam, I like the conversion, although as stated above I prefer the color version. My humble opinion.

    Bruce

  12. #12
    ionian's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    730
    Real Name
    Simon

    Re: Back in Black

    I think you've converted it very well Sam - in particular the way you've handled the path and greenery to give it the same tone in the mono conversion. Did you shoot it for a mono conversion? If so, I'd have tried to put the dog in the sun to give contrast between the dark coat and the light path. You could dodge the shadow around the dog slightly, but it's a minor thing.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Virginia - USA
    Posts
    884
    Real Name
    Sam

    Re: Back in Black

    Quote Originally Posted by ionian View Post
    I think you've converted it very well Sam - in particular the way you've handled the path and greenery to give it the same tone in the mono conversion. Did you shoot it for a mono conversion? If so, I'd have tried to put the dog in the sun to give contrast between the dark coat and the light path. You could dodge the shadow around the dog slightly, but it's a minor thing.
    Thanks Simon. I did not shoot it for a mono conversion it was just an old photo I picked to practice the conversion. You are right about the black dog being in the shade instead of the sun. It was not a posed shot although I realize that is just an excuse for the errors.

  14. #14
    ionian's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    730
    Real Name
    Simon

    Re: Back in Black

    Please don't think I'm looking for problems Sam - your photography is at a level that I aspire to get to, and when I post my criticisms (to everybody) it's as much an exercise in learning for me as it is anything else. A dog being in a sub-optimal position isn't an error, you need the fates to align for it all to work and it's much less of an issue in the colour version - as you note, it wasn't shot with mono in mind so there was nothing you could do.

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Virginia - USA
    Posts
    884
    Real Name
    Sam

    Re: Back in Black

    Quote Originally Posted by ionian View Post
    Please don't think I'm looking for problems Sam - your photography is at a level that I aspire to get to, and when I post my criticisms (to everybody) it's as much an exercise in learning for me as it is anything else. A dog being in a sub-optimal position isn't an error, you need the fates to align for it all to work and it's much less of an issue in the colour version - as you note, it wasn't shot with mono in mind so there was nothing you could do.
    Hi Simon - I did not think you were looking for problems. I do in fact enjoy learning things that are not otherwise apparent to me...and I find your detailed comments helpful and thought provoking. So please be as critical as you can because it is helpful. I should be more specific regarding what I need help on but most of the time I honestly do not know. Thanks so much for the complement on general photography skills. I do not think my photos are that good but I'll keep on trying.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •