Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Moon photography aperture opinions

  1. #21
    William W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Sraylya
    Posts
    4,944
    Real Name
    William (call me Bill)

    Re: Moon photography aperture opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by george013 View Post
    Don't forget that lenses absorb light. Big lenses as the one being used might absorb 50%, that's 1 stop. Matthews setting are the "F11-rule" minus 1 stop.
    For the EF 500 F/4 L IS USM MkII, the T-Stop is closer to ˝ Stop difference. I expect it would be about the same for the original version of the lens. (i.e. When set at F/4, the lens’s T-Stop is T/4.5)

    (REF: DXO MARK Lens’s Transmission Testing)

    *

    But:

    Considering the Lens's T-Stop in the equation of this situation is academic/pedantic (and of course fun):

    Remembering that these exposure "Rules of Thumb" (like the F/16 Rule, etc) were made long ago when Lenses for Still Photography where much less sophisticated than is the EF 500F/4 L IS USM.

    Therefore arguably if any ‘correction’ for the T-Stop for this particular lens (EF 500/4L) were to be made, we might find that we would need to stop it down a bit or "plus" a bit (i.e. use slightly smaller aperture) when applying the “F/11 Rule” for photographing the moon.

    WW

    BTW - having never made one, it's really nice looking at all the excellent moon photos.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    amsterdam, netherlands
    Posts
    3,182
    Real Name
    George

    Re: Moon photography aperture opinions

    Quote Originally Posted by William W View Post
    For the EF 500 F/4 L IS USM MkII, the T-Stop is closer to ˝ Stop difference. I expect it would be about the same for the original version of the lens. (i.e. When set at F/4, the lens’s T-Stop is T/4.5)

    (REF: DXO MARK Lens’s Transmission Testing)

    *

    But:

    Considering the Lens's T-Stop in the equation of this situation is academic/pedantic (and of course fun):

    Remembering that these exposure "Rules of Thumb" (like the F/16 Rule, etc) were made long ago when Lenses for Still Photography where much less sophisticated than is the EF 500F/4 L IS USM.

    Therefore arguably if any ‘correction’ for the T-Stop for this particular lens (EF 500/4L) were to be made, we might find that we would need to stop it down a bit or "plus" a bit (i.e. use slightly smaller aperture) when applying the “F/11 Rule” for photographing the moon.

    WW

    BTW - having never made one, it's really nice looking at all the excellent moon photos.

    I just wanted to point out that those rules of thumb are referring to the exposure value, not to the f-number.

    Big lenses with a lot of glass and coatings have a higher resistance for light. I remember a discussion several years ago about a Nikon, a very expensive one, where the loss of light was nearly 1 stop. But when metering thrue the lens this is not important anymore.

    George

  3. #23
    William W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Sraylya
    Posts
    4,944
    Real Name
    William (call me Bill)

    Re: Moon photography aperture opinions

    Yes, I understood your intent George, I wasn't disagreeing with you.

    Best,

    WW

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •