This doesn't pass the smell test for me. While it is true that with a photograph you can focus on the unfocused areas, which you can't do with 3D scenes, it is my sense that the degree of sharpness of focus is very much part of our visual processing of depth information with 3D. Do you have a reputable source that might be readily available for your counter-intuitive statement? TIA
Nope. I remember reading that information often when I got into photography in the early 1980s.
Both seem perfectly in focus for me. The page that is farther away is harder to read because the print is so much smaller at that distance, but both pages seem equally in focus. EDIT: Similarly, when viewing a piece of paper held in my hand while viewing trees two blocks away, everything seems equally in focus to me.
Last edited by Mike Buckley; 14th December 2016 at 04:43 PM.
Mike, you piqued my curiosity so I Googled it. The first hit on "vision depth of focus" yielded this paper: https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/23426 You can download the complete paper at no charge if you like. The human visual depth of focus is larger than I would have guessed -- from about 7 ft to infinity on a normal adult human eye. The DOF is larger and the acuity less in babies and smaller animal eyes. But the basic fact remains that the human eye really does have to adjust to bring close or far objects into sharp focus. FWIW
Last edited by tclune; 14th December 2016 at 10:20 PM.