Helpful Posts:
0
-
27th December 2016, 06:49 AM
#1
Mad photographer adds barrel distortion
Which looks better???
with barrel distortion or...
without?
-
27th December 2016, 08:22 AM
#2
Re: Mad photographer adds barrel distortion
Slight improvement, are you sure the images are in the correct order; usually distortion correction decreases the amount of visible area?
-
27th December 2016, 08:50 AM
#3
Moderator
Re: Mad photographer adds barrel distortion
Without tends to look better, although it is not particularly severe in this image.
-
27th December 2016, 10:02 AM
#4
Re: Mad photographer adds barrel distortion
You've still got converging verticals
-
27th December 2016, 01:45 PM
#5
Re: Mad photographer adds barrel distortion
Yes "with" has the curved lines at the edges so that one had barrel distortion added in Photoshop. I could have simply cropped it but, I thought, I might add some pop (literally) to have the center bulge out a little. . . . .
-
27th December 2016, 07:57 PM
#6
Moderator
Re: Mad photographer adds barrel distortion
I prefer 'without' Ed,
Cheers, Dave
-
27th December 2016, 08:58 PM
#7
Re: Mad photographer adds barrel distortion
Without for me
-
28th December 2016, 01:05 AM
#8
Re: Mad photographer adds barrel distortion
Me too! I prefer "without" however, not by much.
-
28th December 2016, 03:59 AM
#9
Re: Mad photographer adds barrel distortion
I'd like to know some more about the original exposure - focal length, f-stop, etc.
There are barrel distortions inherent in some zooms, and I don't have enough information from your post.
Lenses in the "35mm" class, unless they have shift options, can be somewhat distorted.
Thanks.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules