Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Sanderling up Close

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    7,604
    Real Name
    Dan

    Sanderling up Close

    Yesterday I was out testing a 1.4x TC on the 200-500mm lens. I saw a couple of shorebirds working down the beach in my direction so got down on my knees and was very still to see if they'd come in range. They hunted right up to within a few feet of me and hung around for a few minutes.

    Nikon D500, 200-500mmE, 1.4x TC
    1/1600s, f8, ISO1600 handheld

    1)
    Sanderling up Close

    2)
    Sanderling up Close

    3)
    Sanderling up Close

  2. #2
    Moderator Donald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Glenfarg, Scotland
    Posts
    21,402
    Real Name
    Just add 'MacKenzie'

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Beautiful, Dan.

    Hopefully, those who wonder about higher ISO speeds will note - Get the exposure right and noise won't be a problem.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    South Devon, UK
    Posts
    14,518

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Good clear well exposed shots.

    I find it is possible to push the Iso a bit in good light when the increase is simply to have a faster shutter speed. However, increasing Iso in poor light to overcome otherwise unacceptably low shutter speeds or prevent wide open apertures always causes me problems with excessive noise.

  4. #4
    bje07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Lorient France
    Posts
    2,382
    Real Name
    Jean

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Nice shots.
    I think due to thickness of birds you should use f/5.6 or less to decrease your ISO or increase your speed.
    But I am not a sermonizer

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    South Devon, UK
    Posts
    14,518

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    The trouble is that larger bird type lenses start at F5.6 or 6.3; at least with the affordable lenses. So F8 tends to be as wide open as you want to go; and focus depth is quite shallow even at F8.

  6. #6
    bje07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Lorient France
    Posts
    2,382
    Real Name
    Jean

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    You are right Geoff and 8 is may be close to the soft point of this lens.
    I withdraw my remark

  7. #7
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,716
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Nice ones.

  8. #8
    GBO25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    867
    Real Name
    Graham

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Wonderful shots Dan. Great eye contact especially in the first two and I like that wobbly reflection in the third one.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    2,195
    Real Name
    Maurice

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    You showed great patiences and you reaped the benefits with three striking images. Well done on all accounts.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    North West of England
    Posts
    7,178
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Very nice indeed Dan. Exposure needed to be spot on given the brightness of the BG and you nailed it.

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    7,604
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Thanks for the comments, guys. One thing about still photography is that it belies the reality of the situation. Looking at the photos one could get the impression that these birds stroll around at a leisurely pace, posing now and again for the camera. In reality they are twitchy little rascals, never stopping for more than a second or two. And when running their legs move nearly as fast as the wings do when in flight. A bit more "interesting" to shoot than one might expect.

    This is another species that I'm catching at the opposite end of their range. These birds breed in the arctic.

  12. #12
    JohnRostron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    South Essex, UK
    Posts
    1,375
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Very nice images. This is a circumpolar species and we see them from the promenade at Southend-on-Sea, here in Essex. Perhaps it's my age but I never thought of lying down on the shore to try and photograph them!

    John

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    North West of England
    Posts
    7,178
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnRostron View Post
    Very nice images. This is a circumpolar species and we see them from the promenade at Southend-on-Sea, here in Essex. Perhaps it's my age but I never thought of lying down on the shore to try and photograph them!

    John
    Ditto in my part of the world in Morecambe Bay. The problem I have is that they are in such numbers that capturing a study as nice as Dan's is quite difficult.
    Last edited by John 2; 30th January 2017 at 03:35 PM.

  14. #14
    Wavelength's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Kerala, India
    Posts
    13,862
    Real Name
    Nandakumar

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Excellent image

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    12,779
    Real Name
    Binnur

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Very skillful images Dan
    Last edited by bnnrcn; 31st January 2017 at 05:53 PM.

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    7,604
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Sanderling up Close

    Glad you folks enjoyed the shots. Thanks for the comments. Interesting that you have the same birds in the UK.

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnRostron View Post
    ...Perhaps it's my age but I never thought of lying down on the shore to try and photograph them!...
    John, I'm not dedicated enough to lie in the sand/mud. Also I have a bad neck and can't lay on my stomach and look up to shoot. If I do lay down it has to be on my side with the camera at a right angle as if shooting vertical. So for these I wasn't lying down. I was on my knees and bent over at an odd angle. Due to the odd position several shots were so skewed that after straightening I lost the reflections

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •