Originally Posted by
Mike Buckley
When we critique a particular style of image, the usefulness of our critique has to do with our experience at viewing that style with a discriminating eye, not with whether we have made images in that style. As an example, I don't think I've ever shot a photo of a racing car, a racing motorcycle or any subject captured in that style. But I've seen a lot of images made in that style, learned what I like to look for in the best of them, and would feel very comfortable critiquing any image made in that style. So, if you're comfortable with having viewed photos of transparent glass, especially photos of those subjects made with a bright background, you probably have a lot to offer in your critique of Rita's photo even if you've never made a similar photo.