Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 24 of 24

Thread: Two Approaches to long bird shots

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    401
    Real Name
    Dem

    Re: Two Approaches to long bird shots

    Thank you, Trev. I do not think that the difference in crop explains why image #1 is better than the other 3 shots with the SX60HS, cos there is hardly any difference... But wait, look at the EXIF data:

    #1 162.5 mm, ISO 100, 1/250 s, f/8
    #2 247 mm, ISO 160, 1/320 s, f/8
    #3 247 mm, ISO 160, 1/250 s, f/8
    #4 247 mm, ISO 160, 1/250 s, f/8

    #1 was shot at a lower ISO and a shorter focal length.

    I found this shot of a heron I took with a bridge camera a couple of years ago (Fujifilm X-S1, 624 mm eq, ISO 320, 1/250 s, f/6.4):

    Two Approaches to long bird shots

  2. #22

    Re: Two Approaches to long bird shots

    I am glad you have resolved your question Dem.

    SO... value for money, especially if someone is not experienced or rich, which configuration would recommend to them?

  3. #23
    Moderator Dave Humphries's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Windsor, Berks, UK
    Posts
    16,748
    Real Name
    Dave Humphries :)

    Re: Two Approaches to long bird shots

    One bit of advice for bridge camera shooters (and P&S) is to avoid blowing highlights, the quickest way to lose fine detail is to over expose - those little photocells very easily overflow in to the surrounding ones.

    I know that risks losing shadow detail, due to same tiny pixel's reduced dynamic range compared to larger sensor cameras, but I found it was worth it.

  4. #24

    Re: Two Approaches to long bird shots

    I usually under-expose by 1/3 a stop under that same principle.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •