Re: A house shot in JPEG. I had forgotten how much you can do in RAW
Quote:
Originally Posted by
george013
Maybe Ted can figure out what compressions where used?
George
Certainly, George.
For your images in order of posting, according to JPEGsnoop:
1 10.57:1, 4:2:0 (2x2)
2 5.18:1, 4:2:0 (2x2)
3 24.61:1, 4:2:2 (2x1)
4 5.04:1, 4:2:0 (2x2)
5 5.04:1, 4:2:0 (2x2)
6 11.51:1, 4:2:0 (2x2)
Best Regards
Re: A house shot in JPEG. I had forgotten how much you can do in RAW
Quote:
A bit pissed about Mike's post saying he did do some tests. He posed some assumptions in it without clarifying what he meant. A wrong way of discussing.
So here some tests of mine with the explanation.
I can no longer track what the argument is about, and I find this tone inappropriate. Mods--is it time to shut this thread down?
Re: A house shot in JPEG. I had forgotten how much you can do in RAW
I agree with Dan here and I would ask the members to be civil to one another in their postings. Quite a number of the latest postings may be of interest to some, but will do little to help Brian and his original question.
I am shutting this thread down, unless anyone has any objections. If so please PM me if you disagree.