Photographer David Moog thoughts on how we describe our craft as taught to him by Minor White.
http://www.dailypublic.com/articles/...phers-rebuttal
Photographer David Moog thoughts on how we describe our craft as taught to him by Minor White.
http://www.dailypublic.com/articles/...phers-rebuttal
I will stick to capture - it makes me sound victorious.....
Interesting comments.
The one thing that absolutely fascinates me is the jargon used by different groups. Over the past few years, I've had the opportunity to get to know some very good photographers in India. Indian English tends to be much more phonetic that the way we speak it elsewhere, so when discussing something we call a "shot", they refer to as a "click".
Possible, but unlikely. My Indian photographer friends told me that in the 1950s right through to around 2000, the Indian Government tried to inspire industrial self-sufficiency so imports were very much restricted so as to encourage domestic industries. They tell me that much of the photography that they learned was on old gear that was in the family or cameras that were brought back by travelers outside of India. I suspect those Agfa cameras likely never made it to India in any large numbers.
Indian photographic gear manufacturing never took off and even today, only the major name brands are usually found in that country and specialized accessories are impossible to find from domestic sources.
Most of the Nikonian.org teachers would say "focus, recompose, take your/the shot." Just to add that.
I've long ago noticed that where I would say "I have taken a photo", Germans would say, "Ich habe ein Foto gemacht". 'Making' a photo is more accurate, as we all know that the process is far more than just opening a shutter and letting some light into a camera.
It seems reasonable to claim that "Photographers make pictures", and that can be seen repeated in one of the famous quotes of Ansel Adams - “You don't take a photograph, you make it”.
I understand that statement to mean the whole creative process - the preparation and choices made with regard to the scene (lighting, composition, lens, camera settings, etc.), the choice of when to release the shutter, and similarly the choices made in developing the image (whether in-camera and/or in post processing) to present the end product.
Perhaps the three words, "shoot; take; or capture" tend to be used to indicate that the photographer has frozen the scene (pressed the shutter button) at a particular moment in time. During a discussion, those three words might often be used in place of, and with equivalence to, "make" (as described above), whether or not the people involved in the conversation are photographers. And does it really matter?
Cheers.
Philip
I've viewed handheld photography tutorials that compare the disclipline/skill/patience to that of a sharp sbooter.