Originally Posted by
JohnRostron
I was trying not to be political. Neither was I joking. These erratics would have been deposited as the glaciers melted at the end of the last ice age several thousand years ago. All any recent global warming might have done is to raise the water level to what is seen in the picture. Since we are not actually told about the previous water levels in relation to these erratics, you cannot present this picture as evidence of global warming (or any other climate change).
My point is that you do no present evidence that a scientist would accept. What a politician would accept is another matter.
John