Hello Raylee ! Thank you for the comment.
The explanation goes like this
-
Thank you all for the kind words. Honestly I think I do not deserve that but… OK. I do do (twice) thank you for the kind words to you all.
So, you would like me to tell you how I did it. Here I go. It is going to be a rather long post I am afraid.
I post the original images here, directly from raw without any adjustments.
and the last one modified at my mood of the moment. After all we are talking about creation, aren't we ?
This work has been done on LR.
Then, I turned the 3 main files to black and white automatically in the same program. Piece of cake I then exported those files to CS
I have then straighten the verticals and correct perspective. In fact I had already done a lens correction in LR I forgot to say.
I turned the layers of the opened files in Smart Layers.
Like this I could place them all in the same document - which I named The3.tiff - and adjust the size to all of them. I mean, adjust the scale of the 3 opened files. It was a "more or less" work. It was not a perfect job. It was just an approximation. Right ?
So I was having 3 Smart Layers in a document called The3.tiff and saved. I then adjusted the size of the files so all match. See what I mean ? With shift down and the arrows at the corners…
Now I was having 3 Smart Layers viewing only the 1.st one (opacity at 100%) but knowing that underneath there were 2 others scaled to fit. Right so far ?
Then I returned to LR and exported the ironed pigeon to CS.
I transformed it into a Smart Layer again and then I placed the file on top of the others creating a new layer (with the pigeon on top).
Command/Control A and then Command/Control T to transform the pigeon the way I wanted. Turned around, scaled etc.
Then I changed the Blending Modes until I got one which could please me. Adjusted opacity was giving me similar results.
When I was happy with the result I saved the files as 01.tif, 02.tif and 03.tif corresponding to the three basic photos.
The rest is easy. Yes, it is so easy as the procedure I have described.
I hope to have made myself clear enough. If you didn't understand anything please let me know.
I will explain again the part you wish as well as I can.
Thank you all for the encouragement.
-
But Elise does it really matter to know what the image are if you like them ?
Isn't it the dubious part of the image, the interpretation, the personnal view an important part of it if not it's own goal ?
-
...