Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 35

Thread: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    It was suggested that extension tubes rather than a microscope is a path that I should consider. I took the suggestion a step further and looked at bellows.

    Fotodiox makes a bellow for my camera and they make the following claim:

    Features:
    Best for extreme Macro photography, with MAX magnify ratio up to 8:1 (3:1 with 50mm Lens)
    Bellows extend from 40mm to 150mm with locking thumb screw.
    All metal construction for heavy duty use
    Built-in Tripod Socket for seamless sticking.


    Would anyone know the formula and share it with me so I can stick in 90mm and find out what magnification my Sony Alpha a58 connected to my Tamron 90mm 272E macro lens gets me with the bellows attached?

    I'm thinking that as it's a bellows the answer would be something like 2to 4x depending upon how far out I push it?

    Brian

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    I just found the formula and it looks good. Tiny pics is not working,\.

    The basic information is that extending the bellows 150mm and shooting at F/4 gives me a mag of 2.67 at F/14.7 shooting at a distance of 45.4cm.

    Now can anyone suggest excellent bellows for under US 500?

    Brian

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    amsterdam, netherlands
    Posts
    3,182
    Real Name
    George

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Quote Originally Posted by JBW View Post
    I just found the formula and it looks good. Tiny pics is not working,\.

    The basic information is that extending the bellows 150mm and shooting at F/4 gives me a mag of 2.67 at F/14.7 shooting at a distance of 45.4cm.

    Now can anyone suggest excellent bellows for under US 500?

    Brian
    I don't think aperture is relevant for the magnification.

    George

  4. #4
    James G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Birmingham UK
    Posts
    1,471
    Real Name
    James Edwards

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Hi Brian, a bit late but try this site all the calculators you would ever need
    You probably found the same one anyway...


    I noticed last night that there was a problem loading images with TinyPic. Same this morning... was going to post images of Orion Nebula ... Ho Hum....

    http://extreme-macro.co.uk/calculators/

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Temse, Belgium
    Posts
    706
    Real Name
    Rudi

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Hi Brian, You can find a calculator here: http://extreme-macro.co.uk/bellows/#calculator.
    I do not know how accurate this is, but I tried it out a few weeks ago and found the following :
    bellows 150mm, canon mpe 65 mm at 5x f4, gives a theoretical magnif of 7,31:1. In practise this setup gave me a magnification of abt 8,75:1.

    I will make more test shots in the upcoming days/weeks.

    Quote Originally Posted by JBW View Post
    ....

    Would anyone know the formula and share it with me so I can stick in 90mm and find out what magnification my Sony Alpha a58 connected to my Tamron 90mm 272E macro lens gets me with the bellows attached?

    I'm thinking that as it's a bellows the answer would be something like 2to 4x depending upon how far out I push it?

    Brian
    James beat me to it....
    Last edited by rudi; 26th January 2018 at 10:46 AM.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Temse, Belgium
    Posts
    706
    Real Name
    Rudi

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    The Nikon bellows PB-4 and PB-5 seems to be very good !!
    They can be found on e-bay.

    Quote Originally Posted by JBW View Post
    ......Now can anyone suggest excellent bellows for under US 500?

    Brian
    Last edited by rudi; 26th January 2018 at 10:41 AM.

  7. #7
    Stagecoach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Suva, Fiji
    Posts
    7,076
    Real Name
    Grahame

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Brian,

    Your figures are the same as I get but the problem you are going to get is that you will be unable to adjust aperture or use AF unless you find bellows with 'contacts'. I'm not sure if there are any.

    If you really want to have a look at high magnifications (other than the 2:1 approx. possible using tubes and your 90mm) you could consider a cheap used 50mm with manual aperture which will give greater magnification with the bellows but you are still going to focus manually.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Quote Originally Posted by george013 View Post
    I don't think aperture is relevant for the magnification.

    George
    Depends on how one looks at it. Aperture gives depth of field and affects IQ. So if by shooting F/4 and getting an actual F/14.7 I end up in my cameras sweet spot for both DOF and IQ.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    amsterdam, netherlands
    Posts
    3,182
    Real Name
    George

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Quote Originally Posted by JBW View Post
    Depends on how one looks at it. Aperture gives depth of field and affects IQ. So if by shooting F/4 and getting an actual F/14.7 I end up in my cameras sweet spot for both DOF and IQ.
    You're asking about magnification, not about sharpness.

    George

    ps.
    I see now what you mean.
    Last edited by george013; 26th January 2018 at 01:05 PM.

  10. #10
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,402
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Regarding the use of bellows. I highly recommend that you use an old enlarger lens at the end of the bellows. These lenses (especially when reversed) are great for bellows work since they can be easily stopped down and will stay stopped down for the shot. This is great when there is no electrical connection between camera and lens - which is the case with many bellows.

    Enlarger lenses are available on the used market "dirt cheap" as an example:
    https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_fro...ses&_sacat=625

    Do a Google search with "bellows", "enlarger lenses" as the two search parameters...

    Here are some formulas (or is it formulae) for close-up and macro work...

    http://extreme-macro.co.uk/calculators/
    Last edited by rpcrowe; 27th January 2018 at 10:08 PM.

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Quote Originally Posted by rpcrowe View Post
    Regarding the use of bellows. I highly recommend that you use an old enlarger lens at the end of the bellows. These lenses (especially when reversed) are great for bellows work since they can be easily stopped down and will stay stopped down for the shot. This is great when there is no electrical connection between camera and lens - which is the case with many bellows.

    Enlarger lenses are available on the used market "dirt cheap" as an example:
    https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_fro...ses&_sacat=625

    Do a Google search with "bellows", "enlarger lenses" as the two search parameters...

    Here are some formulas (or is it formulae) for close-up and macro work...

    http://extreme-macro.co.uk/calculators/
    Or I could go with a Raynox and a focus rail? That way I get to keep the all the good stuff. Chris Connolly uses them and he does some incredible wortk.

  12. #12
    AlwaysOnAuto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Orange County CA USA
    Posts
    1,535

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Hey Brian, I use the system shown in this thread: https://www.talkemount.com/threads/m...ing-rig.17561/

    You can scroll down to see some pics I've taken with it.
    Got all of it on the Goodwill site, except for the reversal rings which I bought used from B&H if I recall.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Quote Originally Posted by AlwaysOnAuto View Post
    Hey Brian, I use the system shown in this thread: https://www.talkemount.com/threads/m...ing-rig.17561/

    You can scroll down to see some pics I've taken with it.
    Got all of it on the Goodwill site, except for the reversal rings which I bought used from B&H if I recall.
    I'm forming the belief that extreme macro is done the way I cook. Mix and match to taste and leave room for additions Goodwill site?

  14. #14
    Stagecoach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Suva, Fiji
    Posts
    7,076
    Real Name
    Grahame

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Quote Originally Posted by JBW View Post
    Or I could go with a Raynox and a focus rail? That way I get to keep the all the good stuff. Chris Connolly uses them and he does some incredible wortk.
    Brian,

    I very much like the work of Chris Connolly because it's the combination of critter, lighting and its habitat/scene that make the images outstanding. But, to achieve such results I suspect the guy spends a lot of time lying on the ground with the agility to move his gear and himself around quickly and also possibly stages some scenes (nothing wrong with that).

    In looking through his images I do not see much that 'requires' a bellows to be used. As an example here's a shot I took this morning using an almost expired dragonfly placed on a piece of rock on a table outside. Taken with a FF camera, 105mm macro lens at 1:1 with a Kenko 36mm tube fitted (guessing it's around 1.4 : 1 magnification). With your crop camera and lens you would achieve roughly the same framing/size.

    No 1 - Original uncropped
    Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    No 2 - PPd and Cropped
    Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    So, what's the point I'm trying to make?

    You have the 'magnification' already to produce the shot of a dragonflies head as above. What this shot suffers from is not lack of magnification but poor lighting, poor DoF (if you wanted more) and poor scene !

  15. #15
    AlwaysOnAuto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Orange County CA USA
    Posts
    1,535

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Brian - the Goodwill site is:
    shopgoodwill dot com

    It's my go-to used site. You takes your chances as stuff is used/donated so you aren't sure it'll work. I've had very good luck with all the stuff I've gotten off it. You have to watch the pictures carefully as the ad descriptions don't always tell the whole story.

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    He does do dioramas. Here is a link to his gear page. he doesn't list bellows. I'm thinking that the raynox, a focus rail and the twin flash set up would be nice additions to my set-up?

  17. #17

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Quote Originally Posted by AlwaysOnAuto View Post
    Brian - the Goodwill site is:
    shopgoodwill dot com

    It's my go-to used site. You takes your chances as stuff is used/donated so you aren't sure it'll work. I've had very good luck with all the stuff I've gotten off it. You have to watch the pictures carefully as the ad descriptions don't always tell the whole story.
    I just took a look and I think I'll be going back

  18. #18
    Stagecoach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Suva, Fiji
    Posts
    7,076
    Real Name
    Grahame

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Quote Originally Posted by JBW View Post
    He does do dioramas. Here is a link to his gear page. he doesn't list bellows. I'm thinking that the raynox, a focus rail and the twin flash set up would be nice additions to my set-up?
    I found this regarding the 250s use on a Tamron 90mm ........................

    For the Base lens at Macro focus, aperture f/4.0:
    Magnification: 1X
    Working distance (lens front to subject): ~180mm (7")
    Depth of Field: ~0.3mm

    Adding the DCR250:
    1. Using close (macro) focus:
    Magnification: 2.44X
    Working distance (lens front to subject): ~74mm (3")
    Depth of Field: ~0.05mm

    2. Using far (infinite) focus:
    Magnification: 0.72X
    Working distance (lens front to subject): ~125mm (5")
    Depth of Field: ~0.29mm

    As you can see, you can get a significant increase in magnification with the macro setting, but at the cost of a much smaller (1/6) DoF and much closer working distance. With infinite focus setting, you will get a decrease in your magnification with similar DoF, and only slightly closer working distance.

  19. #19

    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Philippines
    Posts
    12,181
    Real Name
    Brian

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Quote Originally Posted by Stagecoach View Post
    I found this regarding the 250s use on a Tamron 90mm ........................

    For the Base lens at Macro focus, aperture f/4.0:
    Magnification: 1X
    Working distance (lens front to subject): ~180mm (7")
    Depth of Field: ~0.3mm

    Adding the DCR250:
    1. Using close (macro) focus:
    Magnification: 2.44X
    Working distance (lens front to subject): ~74mm (3")
    Depth of Field: ~0.05mm

    2. Using far (infinite) focus:
    Magnification: 0.72X
    Working distance (lens front to subject): ~125mm (5")
    Depth of Field: ~0.29mm

    As you can see, you can get a significant increase in magnification with the macro setting, but at the cost of a much smaller (1/6) DoF and much closer working distance. With infinite focus setting, you will get a decrease in your magnification with similar DoF, and only slightly closer working distance.
    I will certainly need to up my skill set. Maybe try some indoor diorama?

    I'm feeling the same way I did before I got the Tamron. There's a whole new universe awaiting me.

  20. #20
    GrahamS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
    Posts
    480
    Real Name
    Graham Serretta

    Re: Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

    Here are a couple of "macro" setups just to illustrate that almost anything is possible:-

    Nikon D7100 with manual extension tubes and Nikkor-S 50mm f1.4 manual focus lens.
    Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows




    Nikon D7100 with Nikon F - M39 adaptor and Canon M39 extension tubes with El-Nikkor 50mm f4.0 enlarger lens.
    Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows




    Nikon D7100 with M42 adaptor ring and Praktica bellows with Jupiter 8 50mm f2.0 lens mounted on macro focussing rail.
    Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows


    Pentax K10D with Praktica M42 bellows and TT&H f6.3 six inch anastigmat.
    Need a little help with some magnification math per bellows

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •