Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

  1. #1
    Panama Hat & Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Macae - RJ, Brazil
    Posts
    673
    Real Name
    Antonio Luz

    Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    I do not have a Micro Four Thirds mirrorless camera and I would like to know a little more about this type of camera (I have a DSLR and three compact cameras).
    Is the principle of compact cameras and Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras the same? What are the differences between Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras and compact cameras? It seems to me that the main difference is that the Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras have interchangeable lenses. The existence of other differences [sensor size; a selector with the Tv (or S), Av (or A) and M modes; RAW recording availability] depends on the model of the compact camera.
    I think compact cameras are mirrorless cameras that do not have interchangeable lenses (and usually have small sensors, do not have Tv, Av and M modes and do not record RAW files). Is my thinking correct or completely wrong?
    Cheers,
    Antonio.

  2. #2
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,161
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    These are cameras that have sensors that are smaller than the APS-C sensors found on other brands and have a 2x crop factor. Sensor size is 18 mm × 13.5 mm. Currently these cameras are only made by Olympus and Panasonic and all use a mirrorless design. Panasonic and BlackMagic Design make dedicated video cameras around this lens design as well.

    In some ways one can argue that they are an evolution from the four-thirds cameras. These were true DSLRs that were made by Olympus which uses the same sensor size as mFT, but had a different flange to sensor distance.

    Some people are moving to these because they tend to be smaller and lighter than DSLRs. My Panasonic GX7 is a mFT camera.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    amsterdam, netherlands
    Posts
    3,182
    Real Name
    George

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Don't forget to take in account the viewfinder.

    George

  4. #4
    dje's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Brisbane Australia
    Posts
    4,636
    Real Name
    Dave Ellis

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by Panama Hat & Camera View Post
    I think compact cameras are mirrorless cameras that do not have interchangeable lenses (and usually have small sensors, do not have Tv, Av and M modes and do not record RAW files). Is my thinking correct or completely wrong?
    Cheers,
    Antonio.
    Antonio the term "compact cameras" is a fairly general one which refers mainly to the size of the camera. Generally though it refers to non-interchangeable lens cameras. They don't have a reflex mirror but their sensor sizes can vary from quite small to reasonably large (eg the 1" sensor in the Sony RX100). Quite a few of them have raw recording and the modes you refer to.

    As Manfred has indicated, the 4/3 standard was started by Olympus and featured the so called 4/3 size sensor. You can get more info in Wikipedia if you want. Micro 4/3 introduced a new lens mount design for mirrorless cameras.

    Dave

  5. #5
    davidedric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Cheshire, England
    Posts
    3,668
    Real Name
    Dave

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    I now shoot only with micro four thirds, having moved on from apsc dslr. My initial reason was to reduce weight (smaller sensor = smaller and lighter lenses, but not necessarily bodies). I would not now want to move back, regardless of weight.

    You've had the explanation of the sensor, now about the cameras.

    The cameras come in many shapes and sizes, but all have the basic controls that you mention. The larger bodies will have a very similar set of controls to a mid range dslr, "two wheels" for example. The smaller bodies don't have the physical space for everything, so you are likely to have to go into the camera's menu for some things. The lack of a mirror also gives the option of silent operation.

    George mentioned the viewfinder: optical for dslr and electronic for m4/3. You're familiar with the dslr. The evf works differently and brings a range of possibilities either not available on a dslr or only available in live view: focus peaking and blown highlight indicators for example. You can also view the histogram before taking the shot. However, the evf is essentially a small video screen and some prefer the "real light" of an OVF.

    There are many generalisations there, but I hope it gives a general idea.

    Dave

  6. #6
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,161
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    The other issue that we did not discuss, but had a fairly in depth discussion on is the issue of "equivalence". As I am someone who does a lot of portraiture work at fairly large apertures, I would have to shoot with a very "fast" lens on a mFT camera versus my FF one. For the same framing, I would need an f/1.4 lens to get the same shallow DoF as I get with my f/2.8l lenses. If I wanted to get the effect of my f/2 lens, I'd need an f/1.2 mFT lens.

    I also tend to shoot a lot of ultra-wide angle shots. My 14mm focal length shots would need to be taken with a 7mm shot on mFT.

    On the flip side, macro or long shots can work to ones advantage on a crop sensor like mFT.

  7. #7
    Panama Hat & Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Macae - RJ, Brazil
    Posts
    673
    Real Name
    Antonio Luz

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Manfred, Dave Ellis, George and Dave,
    Thank you very much for your explanations about Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras. They were very helpful to my understanding on this subject.

    Manfred,
    Only one correction: The size of the mFT sensor is 17.3 x 13.0 mm.

    Cheers,
    Antonio.

  8. #8
    DanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    8,836
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by Panama Hat & Camera View Post
    Manfred, Dave Ellis, George and Dave,
    Thank you very much for your explanations about Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras. They were very helpful to my understanding on this subject.

    Manfred,
    Only one correction: The size of the mFT sensor is 17.3 x 13.0 mm.

    Cheers,
    Antonio.
    If I am not mistaken, the sensor is 18 x 13.5, and the imaging area is 17.3 x 13.0


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

  9. #9
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,161
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by DanK View Post
    If I am not mistaken, the sensor is 18 x 13.5, and the imaging area is 17.3 x 13.0


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
    That is my understanding as well.

  10. #10
    Panama Hat & Camera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Macae - RJ, Brazil
    Posts
    673
    Real Name
    Antonio Luz

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Manfred and Dan,
    I apologize for my mistake. I'm still learning about Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras. I got the information about the size of the mFT sensor on these sites.

    http://shop.panasonic.com/cameras-an...1&cgid=cameras

    http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/digi...5-mark-ii.html

    Cheers,
    Antonio.

    Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

  11. #11
    New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    Dartford, Kent, UK
    Posts
    9
    Real Name
    Carl Lilley

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Hi Antonio
    I have only recently entered into the M4/3 world, up till now I have been an ardent Nikon DSLR man.

    I initially wanted a "second" camera but ended up starting down a whole new camera range, and really not regretting it.
    The advice above is all good, I too love the EVF, this for me realised only after I had purchased the camera, opened up so many possibilities, such as adjust the exposure and see the effect before you take the shot, brilliant!

    I know much is made about low light performance, however I have not found this yet to be an issue. Additionally my Panasonic GX80 has combined lens and body stabilisation that for a rank amature like myself really helps in getting a great shot.
    The cameras are increasingly good for video, mine can take 4K, a feature that DSLR's are struggling to keep up with. I also think that both Panasonic and Olympus are pushing the features of cameras in a similar if not so frenetic pace as mobile cameras with the innovative features that you simply will not see on a traditional DSLR. Yes the purest will not want or need any of these bells, whistles and flashing lights, but for the hobbiest like me, they assist in taking a better photo, or maybe just let me enjoy my hobby a little bit more......

    I also really love the whole size and weight thing, so much more practical for a family man who also has to carry the picnic rucksack, beach chairs etc!!!

    I would heartily recommend M4/3, my DSLR has seen no photons in a few months.

    Regards
    Carl.

  12. #12
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,161
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by Panama Hat & Camera View Post
    Manfred and Dan,
    I apologize for my mistake. I'm still learning about Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras. I got the information about the size of the mFT sensor on these sites.

    http://shop.panasonic.com/cameras-an...1&cgid=cameras

    http://www.getolympus.com/us/en/digi...5-mark-ii.html

    Cheers,
    The website is incorrect. They are giving the image area of the sensor, not the sensor size. This is true for any sensor and in fact for any film. The negative one works with has to be smaller than the film area used for the image.

  13. #13
    dje's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Brisbane Australia
    Posts
    4,636
    Real Name
    Dave Ellis

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    One other piece of trivia - the native aspect ratio of the micro four thirds sensor is 4:3 which has got nothing to do with the 4/3" size. Most, If not all DSLR's have a sensor with a native aspect ratio of 3/2. The mft image can be cropped in camera to 3/2. Most compact cameras have a sensor with aspect ratio of 4/3. The reasons behind these differences are largely historical I believe, and involve early television standards and film formats.

    Dave

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by dje View Post
    One other piece of trivia - the native aspect ratio of the micro four thirds sensor is 4:3 which has got nothing to do with the 4/3" size. Most, If not all DSLR's have a sensor with a native aspect ratio of 3/2. The mft image can be cropped in camera to 3/2. Most compact cameras have a sensor with aspect ratio of 4/3. The reasons behind these differences are largely historical I believe, and involve early television standards and film formats.

    Dave
    More trivia re: Panasonic:

    "Multi-aspect ratio Like the Panasonic LX3 compact camera the GH1 now uses a multi-aspect ratio sensor. At any aspect ratio (even at 4:3) it only uses a crop from the total available sensor surface which is slightly larger than a standard Four Thirds sensor in order to accomodate the different aspect ratios. At first sight this may seem strange but the result is that the lens offers the same diagonal angle of view regardless of selected aspect ratio, making it much easier to get a feel for the behaviour of the lens. It also means you make the most of the sensor area, getting similar pixel counts in all modes."

    https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicdmcgh1 ... scroll about halfway down ...

  15. #15
    dje's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Brisbane Australia
    Posts
    4,636
    Real Name
    Dave Ellis

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by xpatUSA View Post
    More trivia re: Panasonic:

    "Multi-aspect ratio Like the Panasonic LX3 compact camera the GH1 now uses a multi-aspect ratio sensor. At any aspect ratio (even at 4:3) it only uses a crop from the total available sensor surface which is slightly larger than a standard Four Thirds sensor in order to accomodate the different aspect ratios. At first sight this may seem strange but the result is that the lens offers the same diagonal angle of view regardless of selected aspect ratio, making it much easier to get a feel for the behaviour of the lens. It also means you make the most of the sensor area, getting similar pixel counts in all modes."

    https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicdmcgh1 ... scroll about halfway down ...
    Yes Ted I have seen this sort of info before. I think they may have abondoned it in their latest cameras but I'm not sure.

    Dave

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: Micro Four Thirds mirrorless cameras

    Quote Originally Posted by dje View Post
    Yes Ted I have seen this sort of info before. I think they may have abondoned it in their latest cameras but I'm not sure.

    Dave
    Looks like they continued in the GH2 model and abandoned it in the GH3. As to the other models, I couldn't be bothered to check ...

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •