Originally Posted by
DanK
When I first started taking flower shots, I ran across some very useful advice from Scott Kelby. He wrote that one should try to find a perspective different from that of a person walking by the flower. Otherwise, you end up with a snapshot of a flower. This isn't always easy to do with a flower. Sometimes, a different angle works, or different lighting, or a macro view, or whatever.
Please don't take offense, but that's the problem with these photos. They are snapshots of what someone would see if they walked by your puppies. The puppies are interesting, but the images, as images, aren't really.
The challenge (even harder with puppies because they rarely stay put unless they are eating or asleep) is to find perspectives or framings that make the image itself interesting. Peter's suggestion is one such option: get down. I would add: get down and close. That gives you a perspective that is different from that of a person walking by. Second, pay attention to the background. You don't want competing, irrelevant details, like a neighbor's roofline, interfering with the image. You have somewhat limited control when taking candids (I wrestle with this in taking candids of kids all the time), but take what control you can. Third, think about framing. How much background do you want? Where do you want the dog positioned in the frame?
None of this is easy, and I still get at least one of these things wrong much of the time. But with practice, it gets easier. It reminds me of the very old joke about a tourist who gets into a cab in NY City and asks the cabbie, "how do I get to Carnegie Hall?" The cabbie turns around and says, "practice, practice, practice."