Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: Cactus RQ250 portable monolight

  1. #21

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: Cactus RQ250 portable monolight

    Quote Originally Posted by rpcrowe View Post
    Ted,

    I may have misunderstood you when you mentioned lack of knowledge re: "flash", "strobe", speedlight", etc."

    You may very well know all this information but here it is from flash powder to TTL electronic flash...

    <>
    Thank you Richard for taking the time to explain all of that. I knew some but not all. For example, I now know the origin of 'BULB' and 'speedlight' ...

  2. #22
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,402
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: Cactus RQ250 portable monolight

    I am old enough to remember some cameras that did not have flash sync and I remember when an f/3.5 was considered pretty run of the mill fast and f/2.8 was considered as very fast...

    The terms fast and slow regarding the f/stops of lenses obviously evolves from the shutter speed you could use with the various f/stops. In equivalent light conditions and with the same film speed, of course, f/2.8 would allow you to use a faster shutter speed than f/4 or f/5.6, therefore f/2.8 is faster than f/4 or f/5.6...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •