Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Waterfall

  1. #1
    New Member PhotographyByKevinD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Chesterfield MO
    Posts
    3
    Real Name
    Kevin

    Waterfall

    Was recently in North Carolina and was able to shoot a few waterfalls. This is one of my favorites. CC always welcome.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    7,604
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Waterfall

    Hi, Kevin. Beautiful fall. NC has some nice ones. I'm a fan of slow shutters on moving water when appropriate and IMO this was one of those times. The effect on the water is really nice. Compositionally I'd like to see either more of the surrounding rocks/greenery or isolate even tighter. This one is sort of in between, not giving me enough of an overall view of the fall nor focusing my attention on a particular aspect of it. But I'm not much of a landscape shooter so take my comments appropriately.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Australia (East Coast)
    Posts
    4,524
    Real Name
    Greg

    Re: Waterfall

    I ma not a fan of milky waterfalls but I like this one. That said, like Dan, I feel like the scene has been cropped a bit too tight.

  4. #4
    JohnRostron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Location
    South Essex, UK
    Posts
    1,375
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Waterfall

    I take the opposite view from Dan and Kevin. I find that slow shutter speeds almost always spoil moving-water pictures. I find that the drops flung out from the stream always enhance the image.

    Chacun à son goût!

    John

  5. #5
    New Member PhotographyByKevinD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Chesterfield MO
    Posts
    3
    Real Name
    Kevin

    Re: Waterfall

    Thank you everyone for the feedback. I agree with the cropping comments and will relook at some of the other pictures I took to see if they can be cropped better. As far as slow versus fast shutter speed for moving water, it is a matter of personal preference so for now I will stay with the cottony look. I used to be in the other camp and may switch again some day. Thank you again.

  6. #6

    Re: Waterfall

    Hi Kevin, and welcome to the forum.

    Maybe I can be accused of having Catholic tastes but I am ok with fast and slow shutter speeds to capture falling water. In this case I think the effect is very attractive and salute you on a great shot.
    Last edited by Tronhard; 2nd September 2018 at 11:19 PM.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    Alaska
    Posts
    7,604
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Waterfall

    Quote Originally Posted by PhotographyByKevinD View Post
    ...As far as slow versus fast shutter speed for moving water, it is a matter of personal preference so for now I will stay with the cottony look. I used to be in the other camp and may switch again some day...
    I'm not in either camp. IMO the choice of ss is situational dependent on each individual fall and the feel that one wishes to create with the image.

  8. #8
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,158
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Waterfall

    Welcome to CiC Kevin. Others have already made the comments I would make about this image. Like Trev and Dan I also have no issues with slow shutter speed when shooting water. What I look for is how effective the image turns out, so representing a 3D, moving object on a 2D static medium is always going to involve some tradeoffs. This one works well enough, but I suspect that you are coming close to losing texture in some areas and that would suggest that you might have pushed the exposure just a touch too long.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •