Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Driftwood

  1. #1
    tbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Osoyoos, British Columbia Canada
    Posts
    2,819
    Real Name
    Trevor Reeves

    Driftwood

    I was visiting my mom and sister on Hornby Island (one of the islands in the Salish Sea between mainland BC and Vancouver Island). I missed the ferry by three cars (drat!) so I decided to spend the hour walking about on the seashore rather than fuming in the car. My theory is every minute spent sitting waiting for ferries, 100 essential neurons die from boredom.

    Found this just beside the ferry dock. I wonder how many thousands of people have seen this log?

    Black and white for texture
    Driftwood

    And colour, for other essential bits
    Driftwood

  2. #2
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,716
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Driftwood

    Hey if you've got a camera in hand there's no such thing as wasted time. Nicely seen and captured, I would try to pull a few more specks of black in this one, there's just enough detail in the shadows so I might concentrate in the dark notch in the middle of the log or in the background.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Ontario (mostly)
    Posts
    6,667
    Real Name
    Bobo

    Re: Driftwood

    +++++
    Never a wasted minute in a car if possible unless I want a short snooze or rest up a bit. Glove compartment has an old s90, pants have the cell phone, boot always has a dslr or 2 plus one or 2 long lens. But as I get older the will sometimes does get weaker.

  4. #4
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,147
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Driftwood

    I know what you mean. I had exactly the same thing happen a couple of weeks ago, although my miss was 6 cars.

    Wandering around with my camera got me some of the best shots of the day and I had to hurry back to the car quite quickly as I had waited for the incoming ferry to start unloading cars before I headed back to my car.

    I find that the colour shot is the stronger of the two. The driftwood you shot was quite monochromatic, so the warmer tones that are along the top and bottom give the image something that missing in the monochrome version.

  5. #5
    Moderator Dave Humphries's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Windsor, Berks, UK
    Posts
    16,747
    Real Name
    Dave Humphries :)

    Re: Driftwood

    Hi Trevor,

    It works and the colour is better, but I think that's because the colours attract our attention away from what I perceive as a slight "lack of DoF" issue; the knobbly bit closest to us isn't as sharp as I feel it ought to be (at least to my eyes).

    I see from EXIF it was shot at f/5 at 200 iso, with the benefit of hindsight, it is easy for me to suggest f/10 at 800 iso might have helped.

    If mine, I'd have cloned out that little loop of bright twig intruding lower left corner, or severely 'burned' it.

    HTH,
    Dave

    My little S100 is always on my belt

  6. #6
    tbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Osoyoos, British Columbia Canada
    Posts
    2,819
    Real Name
    Trevor Reeves

    Re: Driftwood

    Quote Originally Posted by Manfred M View Post
    I find that the colour shot is the stronger of the two. The driftwood you shot was quite monochromatic, so the warmer tones that are along the top and bottom give the image something that missing in the monochrome version.
    Monochrome is still a work in progress for me. This one appeals to me despite the marginal tone variation Did try to increase the tonal range even more in processing but I did not like results as it was too contrasted . From an aesthetic point of view, at least for me, the subtle variation works as no one area is dominant and the viewer can range over the whole image finding new bits.

    In the original the log is very pale grey and very flat, took a bit of work to get any variation in tones and colour.

  7. #7
    tbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Osoyoos, British Columbia Canada
    Posts
    2,819
    Real Name
    Trevor Reeves

    Re: Driftwood

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Humphries View Post
    Hi Trevor,

    It works and the colour is better, but I think that's because the colours attract our attention away from what I perceive as a slight "lack of DoF" issue; the knobbly bit closest to us isn't as sharp as I feel it ought to be (at least to my eyes).

    I see from EXIF it was shot at f/5 at 200 iso, with the benefit of hindsight, it is easy for me to suggest f/10 at 800 iso might have helped.

    If mine, I'd have cloned out that little loop of bright twig intruding lower left corner, or severely 'burned' it.

    HTH,
    Dave

    My little S100 is always on my belt
    I do agree Most of my stuff is shot at f13 or higher and I have a developed a feel for the point of focus at each aperture to give proper sharpness overall, at or least where it is vital. Larger apertures are alien territory and something I need to work on. I was disappointed when I got home to see the area of decreased sharpness in a vital area. However I thought the deficiencies were less than the merits and pressed onward

    Trust your eagle eye to spot this , which is why I like posting here.

  8. #8
    Moderator Donald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Glenfarg, Scotland
    Posts
    21,402
    Real Name
    Just add 'MacKenzie'

    Re: Driftwood

    Not sure the subject was ever going to work as a B & W. Maybe if the light had been different you might have got more definition and tonal variation. As it was/is, I think the colour gives it interest and vitality.

  9. #9
    DanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    8,797
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: Driftwood

    Quote Originally Posted by tbob View Post
    I do agree Most of my stuff is shot at f13 or higher and I have a developed a feel for the point of focus at each aperture to give proper sharpness overall, at or least where it is vital. Larger apertures are alien territory and something I need to work on. I was disappointed when I got home to see the area of decreased sharpness in a vital area. However I thought the deficiencies were less than the merits and pressed onward

    Trust your eagle eye to spot this , which is why I like posting here.
    What you encountered is a mild version of what macro photographers face: as you get closer, DOF becomes narrower. For example, with my 5DIII and a 50 mm lens, at 10 ft DOF is 3.75 ft, while at 5 ft, it is 0.9 ft.

    I've tried a number of shots like this, generally not ending up with anything I liked, but I use a tripod and a small aperture.

  10. #10
    tbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Osoyoos, British Columbia Canada
    Posts
    2,819
    Real Name
    Trevor Reeves

    Re: Driftwood

    Quote Originally Posted by Donald View Post
    Not sure the subject was ever going to work as a B & W. Maybe if the light had been different you might have got more definition and tonal variation. As it was/is, I think the colour gives it interest and vitality.
    I was hoping you would remark on this. I acquiesce to your (and Manfred"s plus pretty much everyone else's) superior knowledge.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •