You've certainly captured Edinburgh - makes one wonder where its nickname of "Auld Reekie" went to.
The last one stands out for me as being the most intrinsically interesting.
The first six images are nice enough, but get me wondering what the shots would have looked like with better lighting (i.e. the soft and diffuse light of Golden Hour). The lighting is too hard to work well.
The last image, on the other hand, is very effective. You might want to see what you get by cropping off most if not all of the railing along the bottom of the frame.
Nice series.
I like the first shot. I don't know where it is or what it is but I've heard your royal family is renovating one of their palaces and I assumed this is it and the cranes are forming a crown on top of it.
My only suggestion is that number 5 looks better after a slight clockwise rotation. I like the compositions and the light helps to bring out the shape and detail in the structures so they work well for me.
Cheers.
Philip
It was the site of the King James Centre, a concrete monstrosity from the late seventies recently demolished.
The weather was what it was, a sunny bright day in Edinburgh and only the pure toggers complain ! lol
Been there done that, unfortunately.
I was at a photography exhibition at a local gallery and had a chance to chat with a photographer who is one of the top in the field of photographing mountains and glaciers. The highlight of the show was a print that was about 10ft long and 3 ft high (a 6 or 7 shot pano) showing the mountains of Patagonia, taken in early 2017. It was taken at morning Golden Hour.
I asked him how long it took him to get the shot. Answer - Three weeks of getting up at 4:00AM.... He was in Patagonia for a total of five weeks.