Nikon D7100, 32mm, f/5, 1/4s, ISO: 800. Finished to my taste (such as it is) in PhotoLab 2 & Photoshop CC sharop enough for me.
Helpful Posts: 0
Results 1 to 10 of 10
-
8th March 2019, 05:46 AM #1
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 624
- Real Name
- E. James
OK I got the Nikon 28-300 FX and I am glad I did
-
8th March 2019, 03:46 PM #2New Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2019
- Posts
- 5
Re: OK I got the Nikon 28-300 FX and I am glad I did
I'm glad you did too. The color and sharpness are outstanding!
-
9th March 2019, 03:11 PM #3
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- WNY
- Posts
- 36,716
- Real Name
- John
Re: OK I got the Nikon 28-300 FX and I am glad I did
Nice shot.
-
14th March 2019, 02:18 AM #4
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 624
- Real Name
- E. James
Re: OK I got the Nikon 28-300 FX and I am glad I did
Deer: D7100, 450mm (equivelant), 1/250, f/8, ISO: 100. Some Raw sharpenng
-
15th March 2019, 05:20 AM #5
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 624
- Real Name
- E. James
Re: OK I got the Nikon 28-300 FX and I am glad I did
Quite sharp for so long a zoom range.
-
17th March 2019, 09:17 PM #6
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 624
- Real Name
- E. James
Re: OK I got the Nikon 28-300 FX and I am glad I did
More for those interested in the Nikon 28-300mm...
-
17th March 2019, 09:37 PM #7
- Join Date
- Dec 2009
- Location
- WNY
- Posts
- 36,716
- Real Name
- John
Re: OK I got the Nikon 28-300 FX and I am glad I did
Haven't seen a Woolworth's in a few decades, surprised Dollar Tree isn't trying to buy. Nice captures.
-
17th March 2019, 09:47 PM #8
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 624
- Real Name
- E. James
Re: OK I got the Nikon 28-300 FX and I am glad I did
Even better...
-
17th March 2019, 10:18 PM #9Moderator
- Join Date
- Mar 2012
- Location
- Ottawa, Canada
- Posts
- 22,169
- Real Name
- Manfred Mueller
Re: OK I got the Nikon 28-300 FX and I am glad I did
All of the images I have posted recently on my travels through Brazil, Argentina and Bolivia have been taken with that lens too.
I never judge a lens based on the quality of an image posted in the internet. The true test is when we look at an image at 100% size. When you downsample an image for display you are throwing away most of the pixels your camera captured. As an example, how many times have you taken a picture that looks sharp when you look at the display on the back of your camera and gotten back and loaded it onto your computer and found it to be soft. The same effect is in play here.
My testing has confirmed that it is not the sharpest lens I own and in fact it is probably the softest, but unless I am making large prints and comparing them side by side with one made with my pro glass, most people would not be able to see the difference.
-
18th March 2019, 01:00 AM #10
- Join Date
- Sep 2012
- Location
- Santa Barbara, CA
- Posts
- 624
- Real Name
- E. James
Re: OK I got the Nikon 28-300 FX and I am glad I did
Spot on Manfred, I have to stretch my small Photoshop brain to bring out the very very best in an image from the 28-300mm yet I fear the lens has been occasionally maligned by those who do not know the lens' "sweet spot" 5.6 - 8 (I think) and do not apply a little camera Raw. I am sure you will agree that, in photography, we are often given over to compromise concerning either weight of our kit or concerning camera & lens options given incident light. For example, while no prize winner, I would have not gotten the shot below had I not been using the versatile 28-300.
Reply With Quote
