Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Private Dancer II

  1. #21
    purplehaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,990
    Real Name
    Janis

    Re: Private Dancer II

    My only quibble with the colour version is that, on my screen at least, the upper and lower body flesh tones do not match, the legs being noticeably pinker. Still, a very fine image. Love the dancer, the light and the background.

  2. #22
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,161
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Private Dancer II

    Quote Originally Posted by purplehaze View Post
    My only quibble with the colour version is that, on my screen at least, the upper and lower body flesh tones do not match, the legs being noticeably pinker. Still, a very fine image. Love the dancer, the light and the background.
    That's actually a fairly common issue with most colour images that have legs in them. That tends to be brought about by a combination of lighting and the fact that people usually get more sun exposure to the top of their bodies than the bottom. Not only does the skin have a different colour, it's a bit patchy as well. This tends to be more of an issue with models that have very fair skin and is the reason that a lot of fashion and beauty photographers tend to prefer more "olive skinned" models.

    If you look carefully at the B&W, the legs do have a patchy look to them as well. The normal "fix" for this is to colour correct the legs (take out the red and add a bit of yellow) and remove the patchiness through either dodging and burning or adding a slight local blur to those areas. Sometimes we even run into model where the face does not match the arms and torso which does not match the legs! The face issues are often a combination of more sunlight to that part of the body as well as some inappropriate choices in makeup.

    In this scene, even the lighting impacts what is happening. The upper body is lit from the camera left side with some direct light but the lower part of the legs are getting some reflected light from the floor.



    Private Dancer II

  3. #23
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,716
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Private Dancer II

    Post 18, Manfred thanks for the additional comments and suggestion, I like the edit and will consider the dodging and burning of the B & W version. I printed the B & W version on Canson Platine and the paper surface did give it a bit more kick.

  4. #24
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,716
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Private Dancer II

    Quote Originally Posted by rpcrowe View Post
    Thanks for posting the color version... Both are spectacular!
    Thanks Richard.

  5. #25
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,716
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Private Dancer II

    Quote Originally Posted by DanK View Post
    a really excellent image. Great work.

    I tend to agree with Manfred about color vs. B&W, and for the same reason, but both are powerful images.
    Hi Dan,

    Thanks for commenting.

  6. #26
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,716
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Private Dancer II

    Quote Originally Posted by purplehaze View Post
    My only quibble with the colour version is that, on my screen at least, the upper and lower body flesh tones do not match, the legs being noticeably pinker. Still, a very fine image. Love the dancer, the light and the background.
    Hi Janis,

    Thanks for commenting.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •