Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 46 of 46

Thread: An unexpected result when using exposure spot metering on my camera.

  1. #41
    William W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Sraylya
    Posts
    4,940
    Real Name
    William (call me Bill)

    Re: An unexpected result when using exposure spot metering on my camera.

    Although a number of advanced SLRs offer spot-metering capability, the metering angle is directly related to the focal length of the camera lens in use. Every time the lens is changed, the effective spot-meter angle changes. With a normal lens in use, the spot-metering angle may be 15 degrees or more. A handheld 1-degree spot meter, on the other hand, allows the most selective measurement of distant subjects and small areas in complex scenes.
    HAHAHAHA! ... that reeks of advertising hype rather than being a data based conclusion.

    As I alluded, using a zoom lens on my DSLR allows for a very nice RANGE 'selections'.

    Sekonic do make good meters though, so Chuck would give them some leniency.

    WW

  2. #42

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: An unexpected result when using exposure spot metering on my camera.

    Quote Originally Posted by William W View Post
    Sekonic said: With a normal lens in use, the spot-metering angle may be 15 degrees or more. A handheld 1-degree spot meter, on the other hand, allows the most selective measurement of distant subjects and small areas in complex scenes.
    HAHAHAHA! ... that reeks of advertising hype rather than being a data based conclusion.

    WW
    ... especially if I plunk my afore-mentioned 70-300mm plus 2X teleconverter on my DSLR camera and get down to a 1/3 degree spot angle.

  3. #43
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,148
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: An unexpected result when using exposure spot metering on my camera.

    Quote Originally Posted by xpatUSA View Post
    ... especially if I plunk my afore-mentioned 70-300mm plus 2X teleconverter on my DSLR camera and get down to a 1/3 degree spot angle.
    At that focal length I need a really steady tripod to have a chance of hitting a spot that small accurately.

  4. #44

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: An unexpected result when using exposure spot metering on my camera.

    Quote Originally Posted by Manfred M View Post
    At that focal length I need a really steady tripod to have a chance of hitting a spot that small accurately.
    On the other hand, shooting the approx. 1/2 degree moon would certainly be possible.

    https://er.jsc.nasa.gov/seh/math30.html

    Pardon me for mentioning a popular "spot".

  5. #45
    William W's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Sraylya
    Posts
    4,940
    Real Name
    William (call me Bill)

    Re: An unexpected result when using exposure spot metering on my camera.

    Quote Originally Posted by xpatUSA View Post
    ... especially if I plunk my afore-mentioned 70-300mm plus 2X teleconverter on my DSLR camera and get down to a 1/3 degree spot angle.
    20' (20 minutes) . . . and you're the numbers man, sheesh. . . better: 0° 20’ 0’’

  6. #46

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: An unexpected result when using exposure spot metering on my camera.

    Quote Originally Posted by William W View Post
    20' (20 minutes) . . . and you're the numbers man, sheesh. . . better: 0° 20’ 0’’
    Pardon my unfamiliarity with degrees, Bill. Us engineers are more comfortable with radian measure.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •