Helpful Posts Helpful Posts:  0
Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: My second macro

  1. #1
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,162
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    My second macro

    After a day of digesting my initial results and ruminating a bit, I tried another subject. This time a small sample of Dioptase crystals that my wife picked up at the Tsumeb Mine in Namibia that she had made into a small broach when she got home.

    Four stacked shots using Zerene PMax.


    My second macro

  2. #2
    pschlute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    1,998
    Real Name
    Peter Schluter

    Re: My second macro

    I have to say I find a black background works best for product shots like this

  3. #3
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,162
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: My second macro

    Quote Originally Posted by pschlute View Post
    I have to say I find a black background works best for product shots like this
    I suspect that you are right. I'll have to drag out my roll of black seamless and put the white away...

  4. #4
    DanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    8,837
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: My second macro

    Looks good. At this low resolution, I can't see any obvious artifacts.

    Since you are trying out Zerene, you might find it worth comparing the two methods. I only raised the fact that PMax is less susceptible to halos. It is also best for preserving extremely fine detail. However, it doesn't do as well in preserving colors. After playing with both, I settled on Dmax as my default for things like flowers; I use PMax composites to repair the DMax ones if necessary.

  5. #5
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,162
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: My second macro

    Quote Originally Posted by Manfred M View Post
    I suspect that you are right. I'll have to drag out my roll of black seamless and put the white away...
    Of course. Photoshopping the background takes a lot less time...

    My second macro

  6. #6
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,162
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: My second macro

    Quote Originally Posted by DanK View Post
    Looks good. At this low resolution, I can't see any obvious artifacts.

    Since you are trying out Zerene, you might find it worth comparing the two methods. I only raised the fact that PMax is less susceptible to halos. It is also best for preserving extremely fine detail. However, it doesn't do as well in preserving colors. After playing with both, I settled on Dmax as my default for things like flowers; I use PMax composites to repair the DMax ones if necessary.
    Thanks for the suggestions Dan and Peter.

    I can't either but for this shot I was a bit too far away and the shot was cropped quite a bit. It's early days and on the steep side of the learning curve.

    I'm going to have to change my approach a bit as I suspect there is a touch of camera movement when I press the shutter release. With tethering I can do this remotely, so that will help there. I'm only turning the focus ring a few degrees and suspect I would invest in a proper follow focus rig if I ever got into this form of photography seriously.

  7. #7
    bje07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Lorient France
    Posts
    2,382
    Real Name
    Jean

    Re: My second macro

    Quote Originally Posted by Manfred M View Post
    After a day of digesting my initial results and ruminating a bit, I tried another subject. This time a small sample of Dioptase crystals that my wife picked up at the Tsumeb Mine in Namibia that she had made into a small broach when she got home.

    Four stacked shots using Zerene PMax.


    My second macro
    the stacking is not enough for me, the two white stones at the top and bottom seem to be out of the depth of field. It's strange because the tip of the central crystal seems clear?

  8. #8
    bje07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Lorient France
    Posts
    2,382
    Real Name
    Jean

    Re: My second macro

    Quote Originally Posted by Manfred M View Post
    Thanks for the suggestions Dan and Peter.

    I can't either but for this shot I was a bit too far away and the shot was cropped quite a bit. It's early days and on the steep side of the learning curve.

    I'm going to have to change my approach a bit as I suspect there is a touch of camera movement when I press the shutter release. With tethering I can do this remotely, so that will help there. I'm only turning the focus ring a few degrees and suspect I would invest in a proper follow focus rig if I ever got into this form of photography seriously.
    I'm lucky with my Fuji X-T3, I just have to tell him what the nearest point is and how many views I want and he takes the series of pictures by himself.
    All that remains is to load them into the desired software

  9. #9
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,162
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: My second macro

    Quote Originally Posted by bje07 View Post
    the stacking is not enough for me, the two white stones at the top and bottom seem to be out of the depth of field. It's strange because the tip of the central crystal seems clear?
    I think it is due to camera movement, but not in the way we think about it traditionally. I have the camera sitting on a geared head, but when I press the shutter release, there seems to be a bit of movement of my setup. I am using flash to light the scene, so the movement is not during the exposure per se, but rather a minor shift that could change the focus plane.

    I will be changing my setup before my next test.

  10. #10
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,162
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: My second macro

    Quote Originally Posted by bje07 View Post
    I'm lucky with my Fuji X-T3, I just have to tell him what the nearest point is and how many views I want and he takes the series of pictures by himself.
    All that remains is to load them into the desired software
    I understand that other cameras, like the Nikon D810 do that as well, but I am not sure if the focus is fine enough for macro work. It certainly is for landscape photography.

  11. #11
    DanK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    8,837
    Real Name
    Dan

    Re: My second macro

    I have the camera sitting on a geared head, but when I press the shutter release, there seems to be a bit of movement of my setup
    I use a remote release for this reason when doing studio macros.

  12. #12
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,162
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: My second macro

    Quote Originally Posted by DanK View Post
    I use a remote release for this reason when doing studio macros.
    Thanks Dan for confirming this. That's what I am planning to do the next time I try some macro work.

  13. #13
    billtils's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    2,877
    Real Name
    Bill

    Re: My second macro

    Quote Originally Posted by DanK View Post
    I use a remote release for this reason when doing studio macros.
    Likewise.

  14. #14
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,402
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: My second macro

    I do like the black background better...

    How did you set up this shot?

    When shooting a subject like this. I like to have the primary plane of the subject parallel to the focal plane of the camera.

    Easiest for me to shoot is to have the subject flat on the background with the camera straight overhead facing down. In fact, during film days I had a setup that I jury-rigged from an old enlarger column, on which I mounted an SLR camera in lieu of the enlarger head. This was a really nice setup and very quick to shoot, since the only adjustment I needed to make was the height of the camera and focus. I liquidated that setup because of space constraints...

    Now, I will often shoot the subject on a background that is tilted so that my cameras sensor is parallel. This works equally as well. In fact. I now have a small pedestal (I use the term "pedestal" for lack of any other way to describe it) that is made from some scrap wood and is slanted so I can easily match the angle of the sensor to the angle of the subject matter. I usually cover the pedestals with a background fabric of some type.

    When I ran a Navy photo lab, we had a variety of pedestals of different types, sizes, and different angles in our studio...

    Any other ideas will be appreciated...

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •