Well, yes, but...
When I lived in Portland Oregon years ago, I heard a joke:
What do they say in Seattle when you can see Mt. Rainier?
It's going to rain.
What do they say when you can't see Mt. Rainier?
It's raining.
But while solar is ideal where there is sunshine year round, it can be worthwhile even when there is often cloud cover. We often fall short during the winter--a combination of the short days, the indirect sunlight, the cloud cover, and snow piled on the panels, which sometimes takes a while to slide off. In the spring, we go progressively more positive and start storing up credits. Here is the bill I received today:
Indeed. It's a problem, but that is just about the worst solution to it. It's the one that creates an incentive to bequeath more global warming to our kids and grandkids. I can't put my hands on links now, but I read quite a while ago that one of the sources of pressure to do this has been the Koch bothers' organization. There are lots of more sensible ways to do this. One is to put the tax burden on something neutral, as most countries do. Another is to raise the gas tax. Yet another is something like what Sharon suggested. MA has an excise tax on cars based on blue book value; it could instead be based on emissions.
Me too. Many years ago, I had a BMW 250, which most people have never seen. It was like the traditional boxer with a driveshaft but with a single upright cylinder. Sure enough, there are photos of them on the web:
A couple of years ago, I had to buy a new snowblower, and the nearest Ariens dealer was a BMW motorcycle dealership. I had a hard time leaving without buying a bike while I was there. The modern styles didn't appeal to me; I wanted a boxer. However, I decided that buying any bike, let alone a heavy one, at age 68 would be plain stupid.