Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: First Try With UWA lens

  1. #1
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,394
    Real Name
    Richard

    First Try With UWA lens

    I just received my new/used 14mm Rokinon AF-f/2.8 lens. This is my side yard and my first try with the lens... I have a lot to learn about UWA shooting but, it should be fun learning.

    First Try With UWA lens

    This is not the best time of day for shooting - I will do some more when the light is better. I shot this at f/11 and processed in in Photoshop with NIK software...

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: First Try With UWA lens

    Looks good. How much of the image quality is due to post-processing versus the lens itself?
    Last edited by xpatUSA; 20th August 2020 at 07:55 PM.

  3. #3
    pschlute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    1,978
    Real Name
    Peter Schluter

    Re: First Try With UWA lens

    Quote Originally Posted by xpatUSA View Post
    Looks good. How much of the image quality is due to post-processing versus the lens itself?
    You can't go around asking questions like that Ted. It upsets people like me who like to buy expensive new or classic lenses

  4. #4
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,394
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: First Try With UWA lens

    Sure - a bit of PP helps any image but, we need the camera/lens to give us a good starting point. I believe in testing the quality of a lens with the PP that I would add to any image...

    This is the walkway down to the pool in my back yard...

    First Try With UWA lens
    Last edited by rpcrowe; 21st August 2020 at 04:57 AM.

  5. #5
    pschlute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    1,978
    Real Name
    Peter Schluter

    Re: First Try With UWA lens

    Nice garden Richard

  6. #6
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,394
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: First Try With UWA lens

    First Try With UWA lens

    First Try With UWA lens

    First Try With UWA lens

    This is the view from our bedroom - it is so quiet you can actually hear the acorns drop from from the oak trees!
    Last edited by rpcrowe; 21st August 2020 at 06:39 PM.

  7. #7
    pschlute's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2017
    Location
    Surrey, UK
    Posts
    1,978
    Real Name
    Peter Schluter

    Re: First Try With UWA lens

    I am on my way !

  8. #8
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,394
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: First Try With UWA lens

    Only if you bring Rio!!!

  9. #9
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,394
    Real Name
    Richard

    WOW - 14mm is WIDE!

    I placed my camera on the table pointing at my Chromebook and this is what I saw...

    First Try With UWA lens

    It is an amazingly wide angle for a non-fish eye, rectilinear lens...

  10. #10
    Digital's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Carrollton, Georgia (USA)
    Posts
    2,757
    Real Name
    Bruce

    Re: WOW - 14mm is WIDE!

    Richard, all these photos look amazing.

    Bruce

  11. #11
    Wavelength's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Kerala, India
    Posts
    13,862
    Real Name
    Nandakumar

    Re: WOW - 14mm is WIDE!

    I too like all of them, really loved the premises of where you stay; (ah, yes, except the second image looking at which i felt i should bend my neck down...)

  12. #12

    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Cambridge, UK
    Posts
    926
    Real Name
    David

    Re: First Try With UWA lens

    First of all congratulations on the lovely design and upkeep of your garden, Richard.

    Second, the distortion of the wide angle is not very noticable, apart from the pool area, so I you deserve credit for that as well. While post processing may have mitigated it the effect, the careful camerawork must have made a big difference.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •