Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Photography on the rooks

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,005
    Real Name
    Ole

    Photography on the rooks

    This was a grab shot taken on our latest trip. I had to wait for the photographer to move to a position more suitable as she kept crouching in various places where I did not want her to be. C&C welcome

    Photography on the rooksPhotography on the rooks by Ole Hansen, on Flickr

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    South Devon, UK
    Posts
    14,513

    Re: Photography on the rooks

    I wonder about a crop from the right side? Possibly end up with something like 4 x 5 ratio or square? That woman has become the main subject but she is currently well to the left of centre and is also looking towards the left, so the right side tends to become a distraction. If the woman wasn't there I think this current size would be fine. Or if she had been facing the other way around.

    Everything else looks good to me and a potentially tricky exposure has worked well.

  3. #3
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,158
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Photography on the rooks

    I was taught that every key element in an image has to play its role, otherwise why is it there? In this shot, the woman directs our attention to the lower left to where she is standing and visually we follow where she is looking, right out of the frame. If this is what you want as a photographer, great. If not, perhaps the image would be better without having her at all.

    If I clone her and her reflection out, this is what the image looks like:

    Photography on the rooks

    Now I'm attracted to the large rock in the top right hand corner, so a totally different view of the scene.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,005
    Real Name
    Ole

    Re: Photography on the rooks

    Thank you Geoff and Manfred for your comments. I do have a 4 x 5 ratio as Geoff suggested but I just do not want the woman to dominate. I never thought of Manfred's suggestion on cloning the woman out.

    To me, the woman is incidental in the image, part of the rock and the sea.

  5. #5
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,158
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Photography on the rooks

    Quote Originally Posted by mugge View Post
    Thank you Geoff and Manfred for your comments. I do have a 4 x 5 ratio as Geoff suggested but I just do not want the woman to dominate. I never thought of Manfred's suggestion on cloning the woman out.

    To me, the woman is incidental in the image, part of the rock and the sea.
    Ole - Open either your or my version in Lightbox and use the arrows to toggle between the two images. Look away from the screen for a few seconds and then look back at it and pay attention to the first thing that you notice. For me, it is quite different for the two versions of the image.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Location
    NYC / North Fl
    Posts
    1,142
    Real Name
    Daniel

    Re: Photography on the rooks

    The woman adds scale to the image which also enhances the depth. Without her, the image goes flat.
    Last edited by escape; 22nd January 2021 at 02:01 AM.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Australia (East Coast)
    Posts
    4,524
    Real Name
    Greg

    Re: Photography on the rooks

    It would have worked if she had been facing the large rock top right. You should have called out to her to face the right way for your composition, Ole, I am sure as a fellow photographer she would have obliged.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •