Helpful Posts Helpful Posts:  0
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Serena With a $15.00 Lens

  1. #1
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,401
    Real Name
    Richard

    Serena With a $15.00 Lens

    I shot these with my Sony APSC A6600 using a M-42 mount 135mm f/2.8 Sears Auto Lens which cost me $15.00,... It was adapted with a Fiodox M-42 to NEX adapter which I think cost me around $12.00... I have several these old 135mm manual focus lenses and plan to do a comparison video of these very inexpensive lenses for head and shoulders portraits to see if they are a viable low cost alternative to very expensive prime e-Mount lenses.... Although the effective focal length of this lens on a crop format camera is a bit over 200mm, it is relatively easy to use on mirrorless cameras because of focus assist and focus peaking. IBIS was manually selected at 135mm but, perhaps I should have selected 200mm...

    1/40 second @ f/5.6 ISO 320
    Serena With a .00 Lens

    1/200 second @ /2.8 ISO 320 - it looks like the focus was the eye lashes rather than the eyes...
    Serena With a .00 Lens
    Last edited by rpcrowe; 19th May 2021 at 11:37 PM.

  2. #2
    Moderator Manfred M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    22,157
    Real Name
    Manfred Mueller

    Re: Serena With a $15.00 Lens

    I don't know if it is the lens or something else, but both shots look somewhat soft, even on the relatively small screen of my iPad.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: Serena With a $15.00 Lens

    On my NEC P242W, the focus looks good enough for Government Work:

    Serena With a .00 Lens

    Good but slight front-focusing indicated by the aliasing on the hairs but not excessive aliasing i.e. not over-sharpened.

    Certainly not a lot of DOF though and I do see a lack of micro-contrast giving an impression of softness.
    Last edited by xpatUSA; 20th May 2021 at 01:23 AM.

  4. #4
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,401
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: Serena With a $15.00 Lens

    Thanks for the input! I got this lens because I really liked the 55mm f/1.4 Sears Auto (made by Tamioka) on my Sony mirrorless cameras and wanted to see if this model was any near as good as the Tamioka version. It's not!
    But apparently, it can produce some acceptable results... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rMnHG5WnkBI

  5. #5
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,401
    Real Name
    Richard

    Another try with a Legacy Lens

    This time it is wide open using the 55mm (Tomioka produced) Sears Auto f/1.4 M-42 mount lens on my APSC A6600. The equivalent focal length would be 82.5mm. I selected 85mm as the manual IBIS setting for this camera and used focus peaking...

    The ISO was 160. Obviously at this low ISO, no noise reduction was required. I focused on Serena's eyes...

    Serena With a .00 Lens

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: Another try with a Legacy Lens

    Focus is spot-on. I like focus-peaking too.

    Is such a narrow DOF commonly used in pet photography?

    Is the post a 100 pct crop from the original, or was it resized, Richard?
    Last edited by xpatUSA; 22nd May 2021 at 12:32 PM.

  7. #7
    rpcrowe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Southern California, USA
    Posts
    17,401
    Real Name
    Richard

    Re: Another try with a Legacy Lens

    Oh no! I would never shoot a serious pet portrait wide open at f/1.4. This was more of a test to see how the rather famous Tomioka produced lens functions. Judy did not want her picture shot and my manikin head is not a good subject for a lens test since the eyes of the manikin (including catch lights) are painted.

    Serena With a .00 Lens

    I'd really like a manikin with glass eyes and eyelashes.

    Serena says, "you can shoot a picture of me anytime you want to, dad!" Sasha is also willing to pose - this is wide open at ISO 640 using 1/100 second.

    Serena With a .00 Lens

    When I have the chance to begin human portraits again, I want to play with a variety of legacy lenses.

    Usually, I only shoot with Legacy lenses because of the special renditions that they produce. However, I have read several Internet evaluations which say that the IQ of the Sears Auto 55mm f/1.4 is quite close in quality with the 56mm f/1.4 Sigma but, costs less than $50.00 USD rather than $350 USD (used on eBay for the Sigma). Of course, it is a manual focus lens and I wanted to see just how easy it is to use a MF lens for portraits.

    Generally, for human head and shoulder portraits, I like a 55mm or 58mm lens on a crop format camera because the equivalent focal lengths are close to 85mm on full frame camera...
    Last edited by rpcrowe; 22nd May 2021 at 04:45 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •