Helpful Posts Helpful Posts:  0
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Processing a 720nm IR Capture

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Processing a 720nm IR Capture

    I just had a Lumix DMC-G1 converted to IR and am trying out a 720nm filter on the lens. So far my captures are pretty soft, even with magnified live-view focusing.

    Be that as it may, I am trying out different ways to get an acceptable image luminance-wise. Here's one such way which may or may not be of interest to dedicated seekers of contrast in it's several forms:

    Processing a 720nm IR Capture

    Converted to grayscale so as to avoid obfuscation by White Balance discussion. Then applied Contrast Limited Adaptive Histogram Enhancement in ImageJ. Then straightened up and 3 USM's overlaid in FastStone Viewer.

    Quite pleased with the result. Particularly please compare the contrail and power cable at the end of the street.

    Comments invited.

    If anyone wants to play with the original and post here, voila:

    http://kronometric.org/phot/ir/P1070817.JPG

    "There are many ways to skin a cat" ...
    Last edited by xpatUSA; 11th August 2021 at 05:03 PM.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Posts
    507
    Real Name
    Yes

    Re: Processing a 720nm IR Capture

    If you have had camera converted you shouldn't need the filter, unless its just removal of the IR blocking filter from the camera. Usually a visable light blocking filter is used to replace the IR blocking filter.
    Like any image the contrast of the image will depend upon the strength of the directional light.
    Most IR images are low contrast. Remember the colour filter in front of the sensor remains and playing with the colour sliders will enable some selective adjustments to be made with a raw file.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    6,956
    Real Name
    Ted

    Re: Processing a 720nm IR Capture

    Quote Originally Posted by loosecanon View Post
    If you have had [the] camera converted, you shouldn't need the filter, unless it's just removal of the IR blocking filter from the camera. Usually a [visible] light blocking filter is used to replace the IR blocking filter.
    Yes,

    I had the so-called "full-spectrum" conversion with the UV/IR blocker replaced by clear glass.Therefore, I need the filter on the lens. I say so-called because the CFA remains in place.

    Like any image the contrast of the image will depend upon the strength of the directional light.
    Most IR images are low contrast. Remember the colour filter in front of the sensor remains and playing with the colour sliders will enable some selective adjustments to be made with a raw file.
    Understood, ta.
    Last edited by xpatUSA; 12th August 2021 at 07:49 PM.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •