Helpful Posts:
0
-
12th January 2011, 07:28 AM
#1
-
12th January 2011, 08:08 AM
#2
Moderator
Re: house of ancient times
Muris
Both, I think, are well exposed and processed images with a good balance of tone across the picture.
The difference and what, for me, makes #1 a much better image than #2 is the composition. I think #2 is too 'front-on' and we are restricted in our view of the scene. I think #2 is a good documentary record of the building, rather than an artistic picture. However, #1 has a nice flowing line across the frame and we can see the location in more context. The 'steeliness' of the sky add mood and atmosphere to the scene. I think it is a very good picture.
-
12th January 2011, 10:59 AM
#3
Re: house of ancient times
thank you for your comment, I'll try to make it work next time,.
-
12th January 2011, 01:40 PM
#4
Moderator
Re: house of ancient times
Hi Muris,
I agree with Donald, although I would add that #2 would be improved (I think), by panning right (and up) a bit so that the main house roof diagonal just/almost touches the left edge of frame and this would then bring in some more of what we see on right in #1; namely the whole conical roof and perhaps half the other distant one.
Cheers,
-
13th January 2011, 10:57 AM
#5
Re: house of ancient times
ok, thank you for your suggestion, next time will be better,
Muris
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules