Last edited by ScoutR; 13th January 2011 at 02:40 PM. Reason: Change title
Ha ha, Wendy. Even in bad weather, you are a star at creativity.
I think in the first you could tilt right a bit, the hills in the distance about right. It is a lovely picture showing great skill. The second, I don't know what to make of the second.
Why thank you Arith, I thought you might appreciate these. The horizon is fine on the first one, but I'm wondering how you think it would fare with a Topaz treatment or Orton effect. I know you have spent a great deal of time mastering these techniques. Do you think either would work here?
Wendy
I think it is a case of suck it and see; I don't know but I usually try and it doesn't hurt.
I think you all have WWTMTOYH.
There you Donald, I changed the title to what I think it is
Wendy, it will not surprise you in the least when I tell you I like both of these. When you decide to go minimal it really does get you in a way that you need to push things to the absolute minimum an still provide an image that has impact. You have done that with both of these. I must say I prefer No1 but I am very interested in how you produced No2.
Thank you Steve, I'm getting a bit worried that I will soon be taking pictures of clear blue skies and solid black walls.
I'm glad you like #1 I do too, but there really isn't much there is there? I cannot explain why I like such things, but this one in particular I find kind of relaxing. I wish I could say I had that in mind when I took it. In reality, I was just wandering around scouting for sites where I might get some good windblown snowdrift shots weather permitting.
Would you mind saying why you like number 1 - Seriously though, no waffling
The subject in #2 was a lone leaf that had fallen into a deep footprint in some not so pristine snow. The way it landed it looked like it was suspended in mid air which was what I tried unsuccessfully to capture with an ordinary shot.
I thought maybe if i stopped down I could pan vertically and create the illusion of falling which is what I did. I had to try a number of times to get just enough but not too much blur, It works best if you start panning before pressing the shutter, and start way below (or above) the subject so that you are at the subject when the shutter is pressed but follow through on the panning. This one was taken at 1/5s: f36: ISO 100. After that a lot of playing around with the colours in PP mainly because I forgot the +EC and the snow was underexposed. I Also added grain in PP - the snow was not pristine and there were streaks from the panning the dirt specs that were OK but not quite what I wanted.
That's about it.
Wendy