Helpful Posts Helpful Posts:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Is it a camera or a car? Those really expensive things

  1. #21
    Shadowman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    WNY
    Posts
    36,716
    Real Name
    John

    Re: Is it a camera or a car? Those really expensive things

    Quote Originally Posted by Pohled View Post
    Hi,

    O, I think that instead of psychiatry I'm going into surgery and send my curriculum to UK-Nationa Health System =D.
    As for watches, hmm, I like them very much too, and if I had money, surely I'd buy expensive watches, even knowing that I don't need them and most of the price is only brand. By now the most fanciest I have is a Tissot

    As for the cameras, I liked these comments about the images. I guess that for most of the laypeople in photography, me included, it's hard to notice the real difference between two cameras above a certain level of quality. And the other problem is when you buy something that you have no idea how that work. At this very moment, I barely know how to use my Canon Sx20 so, a higher level camera wouldn't make much difference for me. By the way, one of the reasons of my photography learning is this camera. I've bought it one week before travelling. When I came back I realised that the pictures were nice, but should be much better, than I concluded that I should learn "how to use this machine". But I'm not that bad, I read in a photo magazine that a photographer ran into it after buying a DSLR and considered that it was a shame to use such a camera in automatic mode .

    Thank you all for the responses.
    The Watch: It's just a timepiece so anything that lasts a few years will do. My sleeves are too long so no one would see it anyway so it wouldn't do well as a status symbol for me.

    The Car: It's for transportation, you'd need at least two because who wants to put soggy groceries or children in a Ferrari. Where's the trunk space or back seat when you need one?

    The Camera: Quality of image, again not really a status item, we spend most of our time trying to be inconspicuous with it anyway. As far as costs go, I'd be more inclined to spend it on lenses, especially if it meant keeping more distance between me and the hungry lions I might be photographing.

  2. #22
    rob marshall

    Re: Is it a camera or a car? Those really expensive things

    Quote Originally Posted by Shadowman View Post
    The Watch: It's just a timepiece so anything that lasts a few years will do. My sleeves are too long so no one would see it anyway so it wouldn't do well as a status symbol for me.

    I normally try not to use the term.... but LOL!

    PS: Is that why Rolex wearers also wear short-sleeved shirts?

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    17,660
    Real Name
    Have a guess :)

    Re: Is it a camera or a car? Those really expensive things

    Quote Originally Posted by rob marshall View Post
    PS: Is that why Rolex wearers also wear short-sleeved shirts?
    No; a fake -- ahem, sorry, -- "replica" Rolex would be fine for that (at 1/10th the cost). I wear mine for my pleasure,

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •