Thank you Peter for posting here :)
Your images have a different treatment, which looks rather peculiar...:)
It is pleasant and the one I like best is the second one. :D
Printable View
My turn now expecting your comments if you please. :)
A view of Wenatchee, WA, USA
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4130/...373700859f.jpg
ridge view_DSC5293 by gmontjr, on Flickr
hi Antonio
I'm quite embarassed commenting your work... :o
anyway, I try to explain my first impressions, I am going to watch again your photo and more accurately this evening. As George said, there are many good things in this picture. :)
But I've seen more beautiful pictures from you.
I think that is one example of image that a closer foreground is needed (I think this image isn't so similar to the one you posted in #253 ), or something that catch the observer's attention... perhaps something summarizing the more important features of that environment (a rock, a bush..).
Perhaps also the mid position of the horizon doesn't help to understand what is the subject (the sky or the desert?)
but these are just my opinions...
have a nice day
Nicola
good work Nicola :)
Please don't feel embarrassed commenting my photos. Go on tell me what you think about them. You are welcome :)
I kind of agree with you regarding the lack of subject in the foreground and the middle of the photo being ... just the horizon.
This is not indeed of my best I have to agree with you Nicola...
:)
But here is another one which I hope you like best. Please comment. :)
I should have posted this one instead :)
Cheers Antonio; I think the blue is because it is blue :p Ahhh actually it could have a bit to do with the deep blue filter. But here is one I haven't fiddled with yet :) :
http://images55.fotki.com/v509/photo...ral_hf1-vi.jpg
It is gold, real gold. :D
I like that one; but I lay on my back here, didn't want to lie right under because of a squashed spider and I was able to get this before a lady asked if I needed an ambulance. :D
http://images53.fotki.com/v53/photos...0991_hf-vi.jpg
I have, I mean: We have been in Cambridge, UK and Oxford a long time ago and we were impressed how beautiful all is. :)
In your image I think you should step back a bit. To have a "complete" chandelier and - if you can - use a tripod and close your aperture to get some nice stars from the lights.
Excellent picture anyway. I would like to go back there some day :)
Thank you etc., you know... :)
Oh and dont' bother, if it is gold, then it's gold and it's just fine !... :)
Caught you :p It wasn't Cambridge it was Lichfield, to the right and above this window. :D Was using a tripod and it is HDR and there was a 50 foot drop right next to me. I could do with a wider lens than 17mm.
http://images43.fotki.com/v680/photo...tes_hf1-vi.jpg
Post 279 looks better you think? The colors are more vivid for sure, but this landscape looks beautiful as well with its pastel color.
I would have cropped it slightly, taking away a bit of the sky. Just as in my landscapes (post 266), the sky has almost no detail (just a bad sky day I guess:D), so I would have emphasized the hills a bit more.
Did you tweak anything, like saturation, or curves? The colors are great and there is good depth in the photo, so this one has a lot of potential.
Antònio,
I really like the 278 one: the colours and haze create a nice DOF despite the use of tele (I suppose that as I can't see the exif at the moment), and the composition is good at my eyes.
But over all, the picture represents well the scenery:
the harshness of the landscapes, the diffused light makes me easily imagine the hot day, with low warm wind and pine-tree smell, (all things I found very often, as are common in mediterranean environment, so I have very clear in mind). Personally, I feel myself in that place (Marocco?).
Perhaps it's not what you see in that picture or isn't what you want to show, but everyone have different experiences, and these experiences let him reacting in a different way than an other person...
(I hope that my thought is clear... damn my incomprehensible english!)
I like also the picture in post #279: it is more impressive, for sure, but in my opinion is also more standard: today the pictures with high saturation are quite common, since the use of PP techniques let the photographer transform an august-hazy-noon-beach picture as clear and saturated as one taken during the golden hours on a morning of October (I mean the better light conditions). This kind of pictures, in my opinion, are always more impressive and more interesting at first sight, since is not so common to see so saturated colours, but for the same reasons, sometimes they have less things to tell to the viewer, I mean, they are sometimes less expressive.
I think it depends on the subject and to the photographer intent…
I hope I haven’t annoyed you with this long reply…
Best regards
Nicola
Stormy morning at Torres del Paine, Chile