Hello Steve
Rules are to be followed ... most of the times.
And I think you do have followed the rules. To place "something" in the foreground is to give depth to the image. You placed the flowers (daffodils) with very contrasting colours just where they were supposed to be.
Well, not exactly. They are in the middle and they shouldn't be. But here it's placement is perfect regarding the hole scene and the curve of the pond.
Some little branches are on the right side are on the foreground to add the composition.
Some people may not like this image. It is not either a classical one or a post-card. It is different and there lies its beauty.
Thank you for posting
@ Chris
Have you ever tried to use polarized glasses ?
They give us much confort near the sea or driving a Mini or any other car cutting the reflections of the asfalt.
I have polarizers built into my glasses..I shot that one deliberately sparkly to give the viewer an idea of the brightness of sun, water and sand.
very nice Steve..! I've never composed so well a shot! and you are out of practice... poor me
perhaps I would prefer a non-square crop for that picture anyway..
Nicola
This is now my favourite from my latest batch. In the daffodil shot above I've even had a B+W done for me with colour only in the daffodils. Suppose the muddy look isn't too digestible.
This one is Ortonised, I like it but would prefer there to not be a car park behind; it is f5 @ 35mm so that the bench and marble plaque are in focus. 35mm is good for CA on my lens.
Hi Antňnio,
thanks for your feedback! It's always full of suggestions and, for sure, welcome!
what do you think of this version? I reduced red-yellow saturation...
I proceed with "small steps"... I wouldn't loose all the sunset's coloured light, in order to keep the contrast between the blueish of the shadows and the warmer yellow of brighter zones... do you think it is a not good goal? your opinion is to have an even colour cast?
thanks for viewing!