Hampi sunrise
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3532/...45cefdf5_o.jpg
Munnar
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3551/...347107f0_o.jpg
Agra
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3309/...2b8461ff_o.jpg
Printable View
http://ftp.execulink.com/~wfsweb/Ima...Roads-0267.jpg
Spring fields in Southern Ontario, Canada
This image was taken on the Kenai Peninsula in Alaska.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2632/...82c955f1_o.jpg
Super shot Wendy. A real 'courting field'. [They]Those were the days:). A good sense of depth and the one colour landscape works wonderfully well.Quote:
Green Fields
Steve
Wendy
And ... 'getting the feel of it' is what is should, primarily, be about. Steve has said the same thing in other threads (including today here in post #34) - that technical 'excellence' is not what turns him on. I think he's just so right. And, in this one, you have indeed conveyed a 'feeling' an 'emotion'. And you have stimulated emotion in others - Is there anything else that matters?
Sorry I couldn't blur the tower, I took the wrong lens :o
http://i49.tinypic.com/2poz043.jpg
and this is on my return home.
http://i45.tinypic.com/33jqp36.jpg
Only(i think) standing replica of the Parthenon from Greece.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4067/...25f10c0467.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4039/...01f1cf90e1.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4055/...98d18b1984.jpg
http://i45.tinypic.com/25u0h9s.jpg
Is this the golden hour; because if it is I can't see how it is easier. This is one of the few within ev span and properly exposed although I like the light. :)
Is this too much do you think.
http://i50.tinypic.com/10z3cly.jpg
Steve
That is a beauty.
My only question would be whether going further than f6.3 with the aperture would have given you enough DoF to get those leaves at the top left into focus as well - or is that motion blur?
But - composition is superb and control of light across the image is excellent.
Cheers Donald; I think you are right. I did a batch using the Canon software and now reworking them with photoshop elements and ACR, I like the light in this but thought it could do with being a little sharper, I've got another but not so good light so I'll stick with this. cheers :)
May be next time :D:D
Well, this is an improved already. I think the tree is important in the composition as you have done here
where I think the composition is very good and the light is gold. I do like this one :)
This is also a good work.
The trees are important in the composition. However, more detail in the shadows would be interesting.
Unlike Donald I would like to have the branches in the foreground at our left, more blurred, more out of focus. :)
And why do I like things this way ? Because - IMHO - what enhance the depth in a picture is the difference in sharpness along the various planes in it.
I hope to make myself understand. :)
I would also apply that concept on the second picture of yours, the one with the bridge. :)
When I just saw these pictures I thought they were from the original monument "repaired" in CS5 so powerful is this software. :)
The original monument is in fact, in a more rocky place...:)
The point where you took the shot of the replica is very low and this is returning a less flattering perspective. Maybe you could correct it...:rolleyes:
The second shot is interesting with a strong perspective, but I can't understand why the third image is tilted :)
Thank you for posting :)