Steve,
I prefer the better cloud contrast of the second b&w, the first is rather flat, might benefit from some LCE (applied to sky only).
Donald,
How'd you get the cotton wool to stay up there? it always falls down when I try
EDIT: Ah, I just guessed, it's not cotton wool, but candy floss (sticky see).
Cheers,
Good to have you back Steve. I love every one of these shots. I prefer the colour versions though. Both of them are outstanding. I must find a place where I can get lower and get the bales against the sky.
I've gone to school again with these. I've just been working on a series of Round Bale shots myself and these put mine to shame. (what a surprise ) I plan to post a thread with a sample of my shots so I can get some C&C but these are very helpful examples.
Excellent shots as always.
Wendy
I remember this one Donald. Another perfect one in my opinion, and in this case the monochrome works for me. I try to imagine it in colour and I just don't think it would work.Re: Invasion of the Killer Bales
From Donald: That's a nice set of bales you got there, Steve! And Kit you're right. I keep looking at them, but have managed to resist going overboard as of yet. This is one from the Pyrenees, France in July 2009. A version of it has been on this site before, which benefitted greatly from the advice given by members on here.
I haven't managed to resist going overboard. I was out on Friday and took many shots at various loctions as I was driving along in the country. You and Steve have sent me to school, but I plan to start a thread with some samples for C&C. (Hint - to everyone - I need help again)
Wendy
Good work Mark. Perhaps a little bit too red or it's just my monitor with yellows and reds
It's well composed. I like the tree in the foreground ...
I can see that you have used a rather small aperture as you have a star on the bottom right ... but excuse me: is the photo blurred or you didn't apply sufficient unsharp mask ? How long was the exposure ?
And... what is that tower back there doing here, in a such a traditional image ?
Does that "thing" belongs to the traditional building ?
Thank you for posting Mark.
Hired a helicopter crikey I wished I could do that to take me to the top of Winnats Pass at Christmas and here's hoping a lot, in the snow.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Winnats_Pass
The view is magnificent and I think the home would suit me, it just needs a bit of double glazing and central heating Very nice couple of pictures.
hi antonio!
Thanks for the wonderful comment.
Sorry. I can't confirm if its your monitor but I guess it too red. Well, that was the real color. I think the temple's tower was kinda lighted with reddish. The people there are proud because they told us the lightings were designed by Tokyo University Fine arts.Good work Mark. Perhaps a little bit too red or it's just my monitor with yellows and reds
Thanks.It's well composed. I like the tree in the foreground ...
I did use F/16 for 5 sec .I did sharpened it. You can view it in my flickr for bigger size=) Are referring to the leaves? It was windy that evening too. It created some ghosting (if it was the right term).I can see that you have used a rather small aperture as you have a star on the bottom right ... but excuse me: is the photo blurred or you didn't apply sufficient unsharp mask ? How long was the exposure ?
Yes. It was part of the building. I think it was made of bronze.And... what is that tower back there doing here, in a such a traditional image ?
Does that "thing" belongs to the traditional building ?
=)Thank you for posting Mark.
@kit
Arigatou..Mark, this is lovely. I like the contrasts in it: the gold against the blue and the highly detailed structure of the temple against the natural form of the tree.
Mark
Nice Pops It looks like the landscape is twisted to the right but probably it's not so... it's the land itself with those small elevations... and the verticals are not clear enough to check if everything is vertical...
Thank you for posting.
-
This is quite an interesting concept. To get the same scene under different weater conditions... I am only sorry that the two images are not more "near" one from the other. Of course I mean with same composition or near by...
However it is something you can try the next time you will be there.
You should have to remember the exact place and then re-shoot.
This is something I have never been able to do. To take pictures to the same scenario, under different weather conditions and even at different clock times of the day.
Thank you for posting.
Hi Pat and welcome to CiC.
I like this shot but before I comment further I hope you don't mind but I played around with it a bit to increase the contrast and also to lighten and sharpen it a bit. Why. With this much light sand and sky the cameras exposure meter has been fooled into under-exposing the shot and with no real blacks or whites the image the final result is a little flat.
This shot has really nice tones in the sky and while it might be said that the horizon should be either lower to accentuate the sky or higher to show off the land I think the triangular shapes and textures in the grass sand and sea in the foreground add sufficient strength for the placement of eh horizon where it is. This is something you can play with.
Keep posting images, asking questions and reading the tutorials.
Thank Pat for posting here.
Let me wrote some lines about your picture.
I think it is too flat in terms of composition. There is nothing to lead our eyes to, the image looks twisted to the left and the fence (?) on the bottom right shouldn't be there.
I am sure that you can do better. I know you can. I have been in Ireland and I do know that you do have many nice places.
Places where you can compose nice beautiful images post-cards type, like mines.
If ever - ever - I am a model or some one to follow which I am not. Be careful.
OK no offense. You have probably read here how I am critical about my own shots. Merciless. I think that it is only this way we can evolute.
So, I give you a work for the week end: (I dare to ask you to) make a beautiful shot of your neighborhood with something in front, something in the foreground - not focused - to give depth to the image. Show us. A tree, a stone, a face... what ever. Oh a cross for example.
Don't be mad at me because I am so ... rude.
Come on let's improve our shots.
Nice Steve.
Excuse me Steve but isn't it a little twisted/rotated to the right side ? Just a little bit ...
Thank you for posting