Hi Antonio,
To understand photograph, you have to consider what is the Culture - Tradition ,where the photograph has been taken ( In this case in India ) and the occassion.
This photograph is of INDIAN BRIDE, as such her clothing and ornaments which she wears is of much importance, (all other things are irrelevant ) as such same should be at center stage. ( Must be included as far as required )
Some elderly persons were around, so she may not be feeling comfortable, as such her eyes
are down, she is smiling not because of any instructions from photographer but she was listening to what elder persons were saying about her, which she liked and gave a pleasant smile.
Generally, all my photographs have little bit of more contrast/brightness but in this case I had prepared two version of this image, and posted 1st version instead of 2nd... Anyhow please note that my 2nd version which I was supposed to post today is almost the same as Rob's 2nd version, as such I am not posing it now.
You may or may not like the Photograph posted here in your most successful thread so far, but why ..? why ? my dear friend you should be harsh....As I said earlier all the viewer not necessarily have same opinion for the same photographs..Hope you will AGREE WITH ME for this.
Last edited by Ashwin; 4th April 2010 at 09:07 PM.
Thank you Rob for your appreciation of my WORK,
Incidently very recently We in India and some of the other Asian countries celebrated This Festival., and the Phoptograph which I have posted is of my Daughter-in-Law enjoying Holi with Colour with her little child Prachi
The blurring of the left half of the picture, specially the left hand bothers me too. I guess this is where a lens baby would be helpful. right?
The reason I used such a narrow depth of field was that it was around 7 pm, and quite dark already and I did not want to go higher on ISO and he was moving a lot, so I just used ISO 800 and f2.8 for the whole afternoon
Thanks, Rob. I did try it but could use more than this. Here is the RAW file again for you or anyone else who wants to give it a shot:
http://www.mediafire.com/?wnownmtgzfi
Cheers!
Thanks, Ali. I edited in PS/CS4.
RAW STEPS
It was clipped on black so reduced blacks to 0.
Used a little fill light.
Raised exposure a tad
Lifted contrast
Reduced clarity on face only using Adjustment Brush. This is a neat trick to make skin look smoother.
PHOTOSHOP
Cropped to A4 mode
Used Neat Image to reduce half of noise
Selected face and sharpened.
Dodged eye whites a little
I think his face stands out much more now. Nice shot you took.
Last edited by Dave Humphries; 6th April 2010 at 06:19 AM.
Ali
When I downloaded your file it was 23.5MB. I converted to DNG with Adobe converter and it reduced to 19MB - a saving of 20%. Those 5D files are big, do you convert them to save disk space?
Hi Ali,
You've got these down pat now - any career change in the pipeline by any chance?
Once I did this and the DNG file came out at 40MB or so. I think I may have included the RAW file (used that option) but anyway that was my impression always that it increases the size.
I think I can just convert to DNG only and reduce size.
But here is my question: if this is raw data from the sensor, where does that 20% go and what does it carry that is so useless?