Hi Ali,
I have noticed that some of the time your pictures have some amount of CYAN cast
1 ) I have duplicated the layer
changed the mode to SOFT LIGHT - opacity 18 %
increased little bit Red
increased Sharpness with High pass. 0.08
Printable View
Hi Ali,
I have noticed that some of the time your pictures have some amount of CYAN cast
1 ) I have duplicated the layer
changed the mode to SOFT LIGHT - opacity 18 %
increased little bit Red
increased Sharpness with High pass. 0.08
I quickly white-balanced the shot, using the white centre of the front wheel - it was a little too cool, and there was a hint of green cast.
https://www.cambridgeincolour.com/fo...7&d=1270716596
Hi Colin,
Your findings Is from my corrected Image or from Ali's posted Image.
I may be wrong, but I take it from the face or say skin colour.
According to my judgement, Image posted by Ali is having highlight portion with little Cyan cast
Green cast that means to neautralize green you have to increase Magenta
The value of images in not only measured for being technically perfect, is it ? :)
:rolleyes: :)
Example herewith
Hi Ashwin,
I used Ali's image.Quote:
Your findings Is from my corrected Image or from Ali's posted Image.
When I used the whitebalance eyedropper on the front wheel it added "+3" on the tint (green/magenta axis) so it thought that there was a slight green cast, but +3 is "noticeable, but only just". On the other hand, it added +12 on the blue/yellow axis, suggesting that the the main issue was the colour temp being set too cold (if you look closely at the skin tones and wheel you can see the blue). All looked good from my end when I applied the correction.Quote:
I may be wrong, but I take it from the face or say skin colour.
According to my judgement, Image posted by Ali is having highlight portion with little Cyan cast
Green cast that means to neautralize green you have to increase Magenta
Thanks, Ashwin, Colin, and Antonio!
Nice correction. I am not that sensitive to these when I do it but then when I compare the corrected version with my own, I clearly see the difference. Antonio thinks he has the same problem but I see his pictures are always spot on in terms of colors, but then I am no sensitive myself :)
Just so you guys know, I really enjoy seeing a colors comes out as close to what I saw in the outside world as possible. But I always have difficulty getting that.
Colin, in the book you once recommended, "Skin", I remember there was a rule about the combination of RBG by percentage for skin tones of different races. I have to borrow the book again and read that part. Once I went by that and the skin looked very nice and real (it something like Red is always twice as blue and green by percentage, or something close to this).
Thanks again!
I don't have to worry about white balance with this one :)
http://i43.tinypic.com/2lik2td.jpg
Hi Ali,
I can't remember the ratios off the top of my head, but I know the section you mean. My personal experience is that adjusting skin tones visually usually produces considerably less accurate results than white balancing off a gray card (or some other neutral reference); I only tweak visually on rare occasions (and even then it's more to correct for a slightly off printer profile than anything else).