Excellent Peter ! Excellent.
I do like the expressions of both !
Good. Very nice Very tender
I clearly like best the second and last image.
That softness is very well in this subject if I may say so for the baby.
The very shallow DOF doesn't forgive the focus point on the sweater / blouse (?), tongue lips when probably would be better on his/her eyes.
It he a she ? Or is she a he ?
Yes, yes.
Babies are hard to photograph I think.
Great, great ! Excellent !
Look: there are fingers cuted !!!!! Please re-crop.
Hi António Correia
Your above photograph appears to have taken on Railway platform ( photograph of telephone booth )...am I right ?.
Thanks, Antonio. He is not. He was getting ready to sleep and of course took a few picture.
I have been very busy lately, no time to do anything else basically.
Nice pictures. Looks like you are bringing out all the trip pictures. When is the photobook coming out?
Oh, about his fingers, I did not noticing when I took the picture. So, there is nothing to do about them. The Canon 5D MKII viewfinder is supposed to cover I guess 98% of the scene but looks like it is less than that.
When I saw these pictures I immediately remembered the interviews with Vermeer and Rembrandt.
These interviews and the way they - the painters - looked at light made me wonder why the hell am in the pursuit of homogeneous light on my pictures with lots of detail in the shadows and this kind of worries when directional light is far more interesting.
This doesn't mean however that images - paintings and photos all together - shouldn't have details on the shadows, but meaning that it is not an important issue or not as important as it seems.
In this trend I worked on the photo of the man painting on the ground which can be seen here and I re-post in small .
All this to tell you how much I appreciated the paintings. I like better the first than the second one. It is simpler and the shadows are not so ... with not so many spots all over. Yes it is intentional as the light is coming through trees which we can't see.
And I don't like the theme and composition. A woman half asleep with a baby on her lap and a young child looking. Too naive for my taste. But this is not an important point of view,
The important point of view is the way the light is worked and presented.
The first pleases me very much for it's simplicity in theme and composition. Light is clearly coming from one side, combination of colors OK, tonalities ... Very nice.
And... it could be a photo with some kind of work on it.
In terms of painting - looking from that side - it is not very creative. Doesn't provoke you with something new. It is a repetition of old techniques. It's realistic. But you have to be able to it. I couldn't.
Well. I am going to work on something else now and I hope you can argue with me about this later on when you read. Thank you for posting.
Before I post I read the text twice and do you know what came to my mind ? This can be your photographic work and you are disguising it as someone else's paintings. Why ? Do I know why ? You tell me.
Peter, aren't you overdoing the blur a bit ?
May be ... may be not ...