Again, not much my forte, but I took it into Photoshop to check out a few possibilities and came to the conclusion there is too much light emphasis on her hand, but more so because of the cast shadow which I think overly accentuates the lightness of her cheek and the right (picture right) side of her nose. (I did a layer gradient mask on a diagonal from upper right to about mid-chin.)
I would also find a chair which is less busy in the background as you have many conflicting elements in place that draw away from the focus being on her face, which of course is where it belongs.
I would lose the outside ring (forefinger) or make it smaller, and crop right to the edge of that finger rather than leaving specualtive dead space.
Overall, I think your lighting is considerably better and you've really got a great model who can convey a wonderfully serene emotion.
Oooh-ooh, needs some sharpening, especially around her eyes...such beautifully expressive eyes need to shine,
Thanks for the feedback, Chris. Are you saying it is redeemable, then? Can you explain to me what a gradient mask does? I take it that it is more complicated than a burn.
Lose the chair, check.I would also find a chair which is less busy in the background as you have many conflicting elements in place that draw away from the focus being on her face, which of course is where it belongs.
She has accomplished what I what I thought was impossible and that is make me enthusiastic about portrait photography. (Sorry, Colin. I was a heretic, but am now a believer.)I would lose the outside ring (forefinger) or make it smaller, and crop right to the edge of that finger rather than leaving specualtive dead space.
Overall, I think your lighting is considerably better and you've really got a great model who can convey a wonderfully serene emotion.
You sharpen around the eyes? I thought you just sharpened the eyes themselves. While I am at it, do you have a standard formula for eye-sharpening? and if so, what is it?Oooh-ooh, needs some sharpening, especially around her eyes...such beautifully expressive eyes need to shine,
Again, Chris, thanks for the feedback. Your opinion is at least as valuable as anyone else's and I am as much interested in people's reactions to the crop as I am in the tonal quality. I showed it to a friend at work and she thought it was too bizarre, not being able to see whose body the hand was connected to. On the other hand, the subject herself seems to like it.
Hi Chris,
I am guessing that Aperture's Highlights and Shadows adjustment brick achieves something comparable to your gradient tool. My question for you is whether the effect of the gradient tool both brought down the highlights and brightened the shadow cast on her face by her hand, or did it affect the highlights alone?
both to some degree, but mostly just the highlights. It is, after all, a diminuitive layer of black which has some erased from it..I am by no means an expert on this technique, but in cases like this, I've had pretty good success.
Sorry, Chris, but I have zero experience with PhotoShop, so I can only guess at what you are talking about it. Nevertheless, I just read blog comments by several people who have a gradient tool as one of the items on their wish list for the next iteration of Aperture, so I guess there is no easy way for me to impement your suggestion. I will keep experimenting with the tools I have, regardless. Thanks for your help!