![Quote](images/misc/quote_icon.png)
Originally Posted by
Donald
Ron
I'm not so keen on that big wall of white behind the flower on #3, although it allows the great detail on the flower to be seen to good effect.
#1 is, I think, good, bit the size of the flower head in the image is quite small and the blurred background competes with it.
That 'straight-down' approach in #4 is perfectly okay and is done well, just doesn't appeal to me.
Which leaves #2 - which I think is the pick of the set. The flower is interesting enough to warrant our attention and #2 gives it the attention it deserves. Thanks for telling us about it.